Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
I might as well add my $0.02 worth... Before I bought my PST 104's, I called OMS and asked them who made their tanks and was told "Faber". I then asked if they did anything to the tanks before they shipped them out and was told "nothing, we just add the valve and boot" For what its worth, -Greg -----Original Message----- From: Scott [mailto:scottk@hc*.co*] Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 6:28 AM To: armantrout@at*.ne* Cc: techdiver@aquanaut.com Subject: Re: OMS vs. PST ----- Original Message ----- From: <armantrout@at*.ne*> To: "Jeremy Parker" <o2toxed@ho*.co*> Cc: <armantrout@wo*.at*.ne*>; <techdiver@aquanaut.com> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 11:25 AM Subject: Re: OMS vs. PST <snip> >If I did not need the > weight, I would find a rig that would do the job, but > would hate to buy OMS because once you scratch the > paint, they are ruined. > > Now, it may just be my imagination, but I think the > paint on Faber tanks holds up better than OMS. Is it > the same paint job? Anybody know? The OMS tanks are hot dip galvanized. Fabers are powder coated (I think....) and the coating seems to be very durable. I have been abusing mine for better than 6 months now, and I am still no through the primer coat. Scott -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]