Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Tom Mount" <TOM.MOUNT@wo*.at*.ne*>
To: <trey@ne*.co*>, "Jarrod Jablonski" <JJ@gu*.co*>
Cc: "a n" <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: Re: stroke tee shirt /dive girl mag
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 15:10:56 -0500
Hi George

I thought in private email you asked that we discontinue the discussion and
I agreed to do so. now you wish to start it up again?

Lets see George, you became cave certified in 1991, just a few months before
Parkers
death,  per NACD records, (anyone wishing to check this out may do so by
contacting NACD) So that is nine years ago which i one could
say is approximately 10 years since you and JJ first met. I think you dived
as support diver for Parker up until or near his death a few minths later,
as you were still gaining experience in cave diving at that time.  Then for
quite sometime you dived as a buddy with Bill Gavin and other orginal WKPP
members, on exploration dives and later on teamed up with JJ as a buddy for
exploration diving. JJ meanwhile had been doing exploration for quite
sometime in Manattee and other places.

I was not even going to answer JJ's post,  except in a personal discussion
to discuss some differences in approach within Hogarthian configurations
that are practiced by many active members of
the cave and technical diving community.

While I planned this as a private comunication it is a discussion that would
be
appropriate for this list if it could be allowed to happen with
out a lot of name calling and other actions by you and a few others, to
prevent actual discussion by people who have every right to feel their
configuration is equally as safe as yours and people who may not dive huge
Tally power caves but who do dive challenging caves that can be every
much as a dive to the other side of hell as what you do. Also OW and wreck
 as this is techdiver not cavers)
dives and some things that may be safer and why they are safer and why some
have evolved to those particular modifications.

Are you game to DISCUSS (actually communicate with each other quietly
and logically rather than yelling screaming and name calling). these issue
if so lets do so if not lets do what you in your suggested and drop this
discussion

If you believe in DIR as much as you state you do and I think you do then
you should welcome an open discussion on other configurations as it would
provide a logical progression to show how DIR differs from other Hogarthian
or general configurations.

Anyway if you would like to have this discussion then lets do it if not
then lets do as we agreed  per your request and drop the issue. It would be
quite time consuming for both of us and whoever else elects to contribute.
But it would be an actual open discussion for all to participate,
Who knows we may all gain from such a presentation of configuration issues.

George is there really 5000 tech instructors wow i certainly did not know
that. who are they certified through?

For those on this list if you want to know what levels of experience and
background are represented in the instructor ranks of all associations
simply go to the web pages each agency has and see how many names you have
heard of amoung these list and how much experience they have teaching and
diving.

For the courses check out how intense the skill training is and make a
logical choice (you can find the skill requirements in the standards of the
various agencies). Many of you will select different agencies and some of
you will do a some training with a variety of agencies. But the inforamtion
you need to make these decisions is easily available to you.on the web
pages. Also check with former students of instructors there are a lot of
really excellent instructor out there not just one or two.


Respectfully yours,
Tom Mount
CEO IANTD World HQ
http://www.iantd.com

----- Original Message -----
From: Trey <trey@ne*.co*>
To: <TOM.MOUNT@wo*.at*.ne*>; Jarrod Jablonski <JJ@gu*.co*>
Cc: <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: stroke tee shirt /dive girl mag


> Tom, is this what you meant by JJ "diagrees with me"? What is really
> funny about this is that nobody but JJ , myself, and those on our team
> who have seen the other side of hell understand any of this, but then
> look who has the end of the line everywhere, look who always gets it
> done with no exucuses, look at who the common denominator is in all of
> this for the last ten years as others have come and gone ( as JJ points
> out ), and ask yourself "Why?".
>
> Then , and I know this will really piss you (all ) off, my opinion is
> that anyone who has not seen the other side of hell has NO BUSINESS
> teaching it. That , my friend, does not leave much room for many of you
> at the table, so to speak, certainly not the 5000 odd so called "tech"
> insrtructors out there.
>
> JJ and I are of one mind on diving , and the reason is we know what is
> out there and have done it together successfully for ten years where
> NOBODY esle has been able to do jack shit, and there are no excuses for
> that other than stroke, stroke, and more stroke, and actually, both of
> us are grateful for that, and at the same time trying to change it.
>
> If Jablonsksi agreed with you or Gilliam on your "teachings", he would
> not have started GUE, and if the rest of the world did not feel the same
> way about much of it, he would have no customers, but the truth is you
> will attract the Personal Preference crowd,  and we will get the elite.
>
>
> Jarrod Jablonski wrote:
> >
> > Tom et al,
> >I may not agree with all of G's politics or personality but then again >I
have never met anyone with whom I did always agree. Yet when it comes >to
being in the back of some cave at 300' politics just don't seem >relevant.
>
> >Best,
> >JJ
>
> full texgt of JJ's comments below>
>
>
>
> > I thought that since several people seemed curious about  my opinion on
> > this that there must be some confusion.
> >
> > I don't particularly understand why people choose some of the equipment
> > configurations that I see in diving but I recognize that this will
remain a
> > fact of life. It does not really bother me but I do not want people to
> > imagine that I don't believe there to be an easy and sensible way to
> > configure equipment. Perhaps in my desire to be fair and professional
about
> > my convictions I failed to state them clearly. It seems self-evident to
me
> > that the Hogarthian style that we evolved into a more comprehensive DIR
is
> > the one that makes sense to me. I know George feels the same way and
> > imagines that people should hear about this whether they want to or
not<g>.
> > Personally I think if people want my opinion they can listen to what I
am
> > saying, ask me questions, or read our web pages etc but I think that
both
> > of us do what seems right to us personally.
> >
> > I do know that there has been a huge resistance to some of our ideas and
an
> > allegiance to the status quo. For example, when I first started teaching
> > most of my "mentors" were very careful to be sure that I understood how
> > inappropriate it would be to indicate that there might be a preferred
way
> > to configure their equipment. None of that ever made any sense to me at
> > all. There was and to some extent is still a fair degree of resistance
to
> > the DIR style. George has helped create an atmosphere where instructors
can
> > be challenged and where DIR has been heard. Much of this process has not
> > been the way I would have proceeded. Maybe worse, maybe more effective.
> > Maybe there is a need for both of our styles, maybe one, or maybe none.
In
> > the end it is for all of you to decide for yourself what you want and
how
> > you respond.  I do think that there is a lot of reforming to do in the
> > world of diving and scuba education and hopefully some of these efforts
> > will have an ultimately positive impact.
> >
> > George and I have been friends and diving partners for more than 10
years
> > and together we took the early ideas of Main and Gavin to what I feel
was
> > their natural conclusion. We have had our share of arguments and
> > disagreements but they were personal and political and usually somewhat
> > beside the point. We do not need to debate equipment or configuration
> > because these tenets seem self-evident to both of us. Truth be told it
is
> > not rocket science. We could pretend there was some magic behind these
> > decisions but then that defeats the purpose of DIR and what each of us
is
> > trying to accomplish- each in our own way. I may not agree with all of
G's
> > politics or personality but then again I have never met anyone with whom
I
> > did always agree. Yet when it comes to being in the back of some cave at
> > 300' politics just don't seem relevant.
> >
> > Best,
> > JJ
> >
> > JJ states" "two things will undoubtedly remain constant there will
always
> > be new equipment for people to obsess over, and there will > always be
> > people arguing over how that equipment should be configured Your >
response
> > to these arguments should be based on your actual needs, and on the
> > requirements of your diving environment." Seems to me that JJ's
statement
> > agrees with most of us and is more in line with Bill Gavins "have an
open
> > mind and always seek perfection" in contrast to yours so where is the
one
> > mind bit? It would appear that JJ and Bill encourage people to think to
be
> > logical to try to improve them selves not blindly follow a hypocrite
> >
> > Jarrod Jablonski
> >
> > President-
> > Global Underwater Explorers www.gue.com
> > CEO Extreme Exposure www.extreme-exposure.com
> > VP Halcyon Manufacturing www.halcyon.net, www.browniedive.com,
www.tankfill.com
> >
> > Global Underwater Explorers www.gue.com
> > GUE is a non-profit educational, research, and exploratory organization
> > with hundreds of dedicated members around the world.
> >
> > Extreme Exposure www.extreme-exposure.com
> > Extreme Exposure and Halcyon manufacturing produce some of the scuba
> > industries most novel and robust diving equipment designed by many of
> > diving's most active explorers.
> >
> > --
> > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
>



--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]