Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
Mike, you are so wrong again - that is ancient "beliefs" you are spouting , long since proven wrong , proven unsafe. NOAA is nothing in this sport, and modern commercial and military diving ( Navy with rb's for instance) experience, especially information associated with the development of the modern CCR's by Navy and Naval Warfare and modern oil field diving indicates quite the opposite. You forget where I get my information, you forget my track reocrd, and you forget who is on our team and who advises us and who I advise - it is not NOAA or any other bulshit half-assed agency of any kind. Now, you need to shut the fuck up on here with the minsinformation, take seat, and listen for a while,and I do not want to hear any more about you practicing diving witchcraft on the uninitiated at rec.scuba - you need to be taken out and shot in my opinion. mjblackmd@my*.co* wrote: > > trey@ne*.co* (Trey) wrote: > > > The real story is that we all can tolerate > > masive ppo2's in a dry environment where the > > pressure is equal over the whole body, and > > the body is not immersed in any liquid. > > OK, I agree with that George. > > > This dumb fuck does not know that little > > point, and so is extrapolating that > > information to assume it is ok to have a > > high ppo2 immersed. IT IS NOT. > > George, I have never recommended exceeding > safe limits to anyone. And even if I did, > where has NOAA or anybody differentiated > between wet and dry pO2's. You may be right > about this, but where is this confirmed? > A single exposure of 45 minutes at pO2 1.6, > or a 24-hour exposure of 150 minutes, is my > understanding of the NOAA guidelines for > maximum recommended O2 exposures whether in > water, or on land. > > Michael J. Black > > > -- > > --------- Forwarded Message --------- > > DATE: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 17:17:20 > From: " " <mjblackmd@my*.co*> > To: trey@ne*.co* > > Not telling anybody to do this. I do carry > EAN40 in a 30cf pony on some dives in 130ffw > or less. It is bail-out only, and I never > use it. I rarely exceed my MOD of 102ffw when > diving this way, and have never recommended > exceeding safe limits to anyone. If I were > trapped at 130ffw with EAN40 only, chances > of CNS oxtox are very slim. Someone twisted > my choice into a very unlikely scenario (the > old grab the ball, and run with it). Mike > -- > > On Mon, 31 Jan 2000 19:25:03 Trey wrote: > > Mike, tell me you are not over on rec scuba > > telling people to dive 1.9 PPO2. > > --== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==-- > Share what you know. Learn what you don't. > > --------- End Forwarded Message --------- > > --== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==-- > Share what you know. Learn what you don't. > -- > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]