Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
--0-1102520059-949719707=:26000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Note: forwarded message attached. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com --0-1102520059-949719707=:26000 Content-Type: message/rfc822 X-Apparently-To: mjblackmd@ya*.co* via mdd201.mail.yahoo.com X-Track2: 2 X-Track: 1: 40 Received: from mc-qout4.whowhere.com (209.185.123.18) by mta118.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Feb 2000 02:59:06 -0000 Received: from Unknown/Local ([?.?.?.?]) by my-deja.com; Fri Feb 4 18:58:40 2000 To: mjblackmd@ya*.co* Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2000 18:58:40 -0800 From: " " <mjblackmd@my*.co*> Message-ID: <DHEAENHCAHDBKBAA@my*.co*> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sent-Mail: off X-Mailer: MailCity Service Subject: Re: Fw: Dr. Bennett's Nitrox article X-Sender-Ip: 208.212.83.68 Organization: My Deja Email (http://www.my-deja.com:80) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Language: en Content-Length: 2043 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -- --------- Forwarded Message --------- DATE: Fri, 04 Feb 2000 16:51:57 From: " " <mjblackmd@my*.co*> To: techdiver@aquanaut.com trey@ne*.co* (Trey) wrote: > The real story is that we all can tolerate > masive ppo2's in a dry environment where the > pressure is equal over the whole body, and > the body is not immersed in any liquid. OK, I agree with that George. > This dumb fuck does not know that little > point, and so is extrapolating that > information to assume it is ok to have a > high ppo2 immersed. IT IS NOT. George, I have never recommended exceeding safe limits to anyone. And even if I did, where has NOAA or anybody differentiated between wet and dry pO2's. You may be right about this, but where is this confirmed? A single exposure of 45 minutes at pO2 1.6, or a 24-hour exposure of 150 minutes, is my understanding of the NOAA guidelines for maximum recommended O2 exposures whether in water, or on land. Michael J. Black -- --------- Forwarded Message --------- DATE: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 17:17:20 From: " " <mjblackmd@my*.co*> To: trey@ne*.co* Not telling anybody to do this. I do carry EAN40 in a 30cf pony on some dives in 130ffw or less. It is bail-out only, and I never use it. I rarely exceed my MOD of 102ffw when diving this way, and have never recommended exceeding safe limits to anyone. If I were trapped at 130ffw with EAN40 only, chances of CNS oxtox are very slim. Someone twisted my choice into a very unlikely scenario (the old grab the ball, and run with it). Mike -- On Mon, 31 Jan 2000 19:25:03 Trey wrote: > Mike, tell me you are not over on rec scuba > telling people to dive 1.9 PPO2. --== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==-- Share what you know. Learn what you don't. --------- End Forwarded Message --------- --== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==-- Share what you know. Learn what you don't. --------- End Forwarded Message --------- --== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==-- Share what you know. Learn what you don't. --0-1102520059-949719707=:26000-- -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]