Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
My correction is very slight. I have worn glasses since I am eight, that makes it 28 years. I never wear contacts and only need to remove them for one thing (to get through my neck seal :-)) I have a corrective mask and a corrective spare mask. Bruce Graham wrote: > Thomas: > What is your correction? > How long have you been wearing glasses? > Do you wear contact lens' when diving or corrective mask? > > >>> "Thomas A. Easop" <tomeasop@mi*.co*> 01/27/00 01:54PM >>> > HELLO RBDhunter > > Now that you can see without glasses you should reread my post, and get a clue. > The word 'knife' is notated such that *I* know it is not used in the procedure. > Its figurative. I know all about the procedure. > > My point is the last question asked in the original post was 'is it DIR'? That is > what I answered. > > My response is totally correct and based on fact. Guess what. Strokes that people > like you love to bitch about have a diving complication rate MUCH LOWER than your > less than 2% for the procedure. You will not risk diving non DIR but you willing > to subject your sight to this procedure. Listen to yourself. My purpose here is > education, lets keep it that way! > > If your lifestyle is so active you cannot wear glasses and you want to have this > done then go ahead that is your decision. It is definately not worth the risk for > me, foregoing my active lifestyle. And my statement also did not speak to people > whose vision can not be corrected with glasses. > > RBDhunter@ao*.co* wrote: > > > << Going under the 'knife' for a condition easily corrected with a simple > > lens, > > subjecting yourself to side effects, botched operations, etc., is definately > > NOT DIR. > > >> > > > > Tom, > > > > Are you familiar with this procedure at all? > > FYI, lasik surgery is non-invasive. There is no knife involved, and the best > > surgeons have complications in less than 2% of cases when the patient follows > > post-Op direction. Side effects are even more rare. Some people with active > > work or sport lives feel its worth the cost and minimal risk to see without > > the need for glasses or contacts. The request was for direction not a > > personal and obviously inexperienced opinion. Our purpose here is education, > > lets keep it that way! > > > > Regards, > > Richard Daniel > > -- > > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. > > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. > > -- > The Guns and Armour of Scapa Flow Scotland > 1998 Underwater Photographic Survey of Historic Wrecks > http://www.gunsofscapa.demon.co.uk/ > > -- > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. > > This communication may be privileged and confidential and is intended only for the individual or entity named above and others who have been specifically authorized to receive it. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail or by telephone at (213) 620-7700, and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. -- The Guns and Armour of Scapa Flow Scotland 1998 Underwater Photographic Survey of Historic Wrecks http://www.gunsofscapa.demon.co.uk/ -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]