Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Mcinnis, Don" <Don.Mcinnis@in*.co*>
To: "'kirvine@sa*.ne*'" <kirvine@sa*.ne*>, QUEST@GU*.CO*
Cc: techdiver <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: RE: SAMPLE DECO DIVE - 220 FOR 25
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 1999 10:25:08 -0600

3) we "SIT" on the 70 foot stop for quite a bit longer than is suggested
by theory. The reason is we want to use that wide open oxygen window for
all it is worth down there to both clear the slate as much as possible,
and to move that ceiling again quite a bit so that we can abbreviate the
stops above as their ppo2 declines, rather than lengthening them as
either Bulhmann or bubble mechanics would indicate - real life says we
are correct. In fact, I have SKIPPED up to 100 minutes of our 40 foot
stops with no repercussions, and Lucy Ho can vouch for me on this ( and
the doppler says so). The other reason is that we want to give the blood
a chance to totally circulate with the new gas. While it hits the key
body parts immediately ( spine, heart, brain), it takes a couple of
minutes to get to everything properly. We do not want to hammer high
popo2's, we want to use them to our advanntage. 


George,

	Does this work because the saturation of nitrogen is low in the
system due to using the higher amount of He in the mix? Everything taught to
this point has been that the deeper stops saturate the slower compartments
and therefore should add time to the shallower stops instead of subtracting
from them. 


	Regards, Don

		 
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]