Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 02:05:32 +0100
To: <MrClark95@ao*.co*>
From: Hans Petter Roverud <proverud@on*.no*>
Subject: Re: deep air death at 40 fathom grotto
Cc: techdiver <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
MrClark95, tell me this is a troll!

swift recovery,

Hans

At 09:52 AM 11/28/99 -0500, MrClark95@ao*.co* wrote:

>Chris, I agree. I for one would rather hear about safe deep air diving from
>Mark Zurl than any of Irvine's ridiculous pansy diving, and I too have a set
>of Navy Extreme Exposure Air Tables which have served me quite well, thank
>you. If you can't do it on air, you have no business diving at all.
>
>Zurl needs to ignore the naysayers and get back on here where he is badly
>needed for the kind of great information and diving excellence he represents.
>For instance, I would kill to get a closer look at how he duct tapes a pony
>bottle to a set doubles - now that is a slick idea.
>
>
>Chris Curtis wrote:
> >
> > To all my fellow Tech Divers;
> >
> > My name is Chris Curtis and I am the least talented technical diver that I
> > know. However, I feel it necessary to comment upon the "trash talk" that
> > seems to be popular with certain individuals.
> >  I have U.S. Navy Air Tables from my first scuba certification text " The
> > New science of  Skin and Scuba Diving" written in the 1950's and 
> upgraded in
> > the 1960's that lists Standard and No Decompression  Tables to 190'  and
> > Exceptional and Extreme Exposures tables to 300'. These were with equipment
> > that included a single or double tank (with straps and not even a backpack,
> > double hose regulators, a dive watch and MAYBE a pressure gauge ( 
> although I
> > personally never knew any one who owned one). Scuba diving tended to be 
> more
> > risky in regard to equipment, but was counterbalanced 
> by  rigorous  dive and
> > water skills.
> >
> > Technology, education, and organized training have improved greatly, but
> > attitude toward risks a have remained constant. People have different 
> levels
> > of ability and experiences and therefore evaluate dives differently and 
> each
> > person is ultimately responsible their own life. What one person may
> > consider safe and routine, another may consider hazardous and exceptional.
> > We are all or should be, serious or professional scuba divers whether 
> at 33'
> > or 330' down.
> >
> > The belief that anyone can or should berate or degrade another person for
> > experiences, skills, or practices that conflict or differ from someone else
> > demonstrates a basic social maladjustment that is unsuited to group
> > discussions or activities. Mark Zurl, whom I believe to an excellent diver
> > and person, has been persecuted and vilified repeatedly, and now is
> > withdrawn from the mailing list, to accommodate individuals with obviously
> > poor communication (i.e. trash talking) and social skills and probably less
> > scuba diving abilities or experience.
> >
> > Mr. Zurl, come back, we need you.
> >
> > Mr. Irvine, learn some manners.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: FLTechDiver-owner@mikey.net [mailto:FLTechDiver-owner@mikey.net]On
> > Behalf Of mcz
> > Sent: Thursday, November 25, 1999 12:16 PM
> > To: pina
> > Cc: kirvine@sa*.ne*; techdiver; FLTechdiver@mikey.net
> > Subject: Re: deep air death at 40 fathom grotto
> >
> > All -
> >
> > I subscribed to this list (techdiver,  not FLTechDiver)
> > recently in anticipation that I might find
> > a forum whereby I might discuss technical diving with others who share
> > my interests.  What I have found instead was an email list that has been
> > reduced to ranting and raging insults, loud mouthed bullying, personal
> > attacks and belittlement, and much pointless and superflous foul language.
> > All this seems to be orchestrated by just several people and anybody who
> > follows this list would not have a hard time ascertaining who they are.
> >
> > So for the record, I am unsubscribing from this list because Mr. Irvine's
> > comments below to Pina are more than outrageous, they go beyond the
> > bounds of common decency and respect to divers everywhere.
> >
> > By the way, deep air dives can be done safely.
> >
> > Mark Zurl
> >
> > pina wrote:
> >
> > >         Mr. Irvine, I have nothing to do with what happened, and I 
> totally
> > > agree with you about the hazards of deep air.  I don't know you nor do I
> > > know most of the people on this list becauseI have only been diving since
> > > this year.  I dive all the time and love it very much and am always very
> > > thankful for acquiring new knowledge about how to do it more safely, 
> which
> > > is why I am on this list.
> > >
> > >         I started diving up in the grotto and therefore know all the
> > people
> > > related to it, that is where I got my account of the story.  But please
> > > don't assume that just because I know someone who told me about what
> > > happened there, that I am involved in any way.  I may have started on 
> deep
> > > air but am intelligent enough to not still be diving it.  I have so very
> > > much to learn about diving, which is why I tried to make my account of
> > what
> > > happened as unflavored by opinion as possible.  I only wanted to inform
> > the
> > > list of the details which I personally had been privy to.
> > >
> > >     I have no insurance to lose.  I have no ego to protect.  I mean no
> > > disrespect to anyone, be it the families of the deceased diver who may be
> > > reading this list, or you and all of the people who help through whatever
> > > message suits them to spread the message to newcomers like myself that
> > > diving deep air is dangerous.  If it weren't for all of the helpful and
> > > experienced divers I have met since I moved down here <and joined this
> > > list>, *teaching* others like myself a safer way to dive, maybe I would
> > > still be up there and maybe that story would have been about me.  True,
> > some
> > > people are die hard old salty dogs about deep air.  But others, like
> > myself,
> > > started doing it becuase I hadn't found a better way and that was all 
> that
> > > was available to me at the time.  Thank god for evolution and knowledge,
> > and
> > > may it continue.
> > >
> > >     I have no interest in arguing with you or anyone else about diving,
> > nor
> > > do I have any place doing so with my very limited experience.  I just was
> > > relaying information that I thought others might be interested in.  I am
> > on
> > > here to learn as much as possible, and in between the scattered mayhem, I
> > do
> > > learn quite a lot.  Thank you sir, and others who have read this message,
> > > for your time, and have a Happy Thanksgiving.
> > > --pina
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: <kirvine@sa*.ne*>
> > > To: pina <DeepBlueSHE@ne*.co*>
> > > Cc: techdiver <techdiver@aquanaut.com>; <FLTechdiver@mikey.net>
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 25, 1999 3:59 AM
> > > Subject: Re: deep air death at 40 fathom grotto
> > >
> > > > Pina, the dates do not matter - do stupid things like deep air and you
> > > > can just keep sending out the same release each time. Bullshit is
> > > > bullshit, and what is going on at 40 fathom grotto is bullshit, and
> > > > everyone seems to know that othre than a small handfull of idiots.
> > > >
> > > > This is not my opinion, it is reality - only a moron dives deep air,
> > > > teaches deep air, or would try to send out anything as stupid as 
> blaming
> > > > a deap air death on a "violation of standards". It is a violation of
> > > > common sense, and in my opinion , what you people arr doing is 
> criminal,
> > > > and I really hope you not only get sued into oblivion, I hope you get
> > > > charged with murder, because in my opionion that is what you are
> > > > attempting to commit every time you do this.
> > > > '
> > > > You people are so stupid and so out of line it is ridiculous. Hopefully
> > > > you will lose your insurance and then your ass.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > pina wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >     The article posted on that webpage
> > > > > (http://www.cisatlantic.com/trimix/AQUAcorps/contents.htm) is not
> > > > > about the incident from last weekend  (you can check the html source
> > > > > and see the date it was created was 5/28/98). I haven't seen any
> > > > > detailed printed information about the recent incident yet, but I
> > > > > think it has been in a couple small newspaper articles.
> > > > >
> > > > >     The trimix instructor (the survivor) was from  Atlanta and the
> > > > > student <instructor also> was from Tennessee.  The instructor
> > > > > was familiar with the site, and knew specifically that he was not to
> > > > > go deeper than 200' under any circumstances.
> > > > >
> > > > >     The pair went down a line to 220' ish which ends at a Oldsmobile,
> > > > > followed that line over to a VW van and from there left the lines and
> > > > > went exploring the bottom of the Grotto (with a compass I guess, or
> > > > > perhaps a reel or maybe nothing at all).  They drifted down the slope
> > > > > to 230' and that is where the instructor said that his student shot
> > > > > off swimming away from him.
> > > > >
> > > > >     He went to chase the student and then he got entangled in 
> whatever
> > > > > he got entangled in.  The instructor stated that he got entangled 
> in a
> > > > > line <but at 230' in the Grotto there are not very many lines, just
> > > > > one straight one which is kept taught> so he must have been severely
> > > > > impaired at that time, perhaps gotten entangled in his reel (if 
> he was
> > > > > running one - which I don't know either way).  By the time he got out
> > > > > of it he realized he was in the red zone and ascended immediately.
> > > > >
> > > > >     A diver on the 30 ft. platform shared air with the OOA instructor
> > > > > and led him over to the o2 and alerted surface divers to the missing
> > > > > diver.  Someone jumped in and immediately began searching for 
> him, but
> > > > > he was not located and after about 30 minutes it was determined that
> > > > > he must be dead.  His fins were found, however, at 230'.  That means
> > > > > that the deceased diver took off his fins in 230' of water, makes
> > > > > sense.
> > > > >
> > > > >     The instructor who survived had missed his deco stops (which I
> > > > > guess were all planned for air since he had no stages... looks like
> > > > > they were bluffing about those being trimix training dives).  After
> > > > > breathing off the o2 for a while he was sent to the hospital as a
> > > > > precautionary measure, but apparently no symptoms were evident.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________
> > > NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
> > > Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
> > > http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
> > > ============================================================
> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a message to:
> > > listserv@mi*.ne*
> > > and in the *BODY* of the message type:
> > > unsubscribe FLTechDiver
> >
> > ============================================================
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a message to:
> > listserv@mi*.ne*
> > and in the *BODY* of the message type:
> > unsubscribe FLTechDiver
>--
>Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
>Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.


--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]