Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Sean Cary" <smcary@mi*.co*>
To: <kirvine@sa*.ne*>, "Karen Nakamura" <karen@gp*.co*>
Cc: <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: Re: The Quick and the Dead Release was Re: DIR on RIB's
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1999 17:15:28 -0500
Karen,

Hell if your that worried about getting them out fast CUT IT  (Shears/knife
etc...)  Try cutting a BC off...hell of alot easier to cut a 2" web then a
boat load of other crap on a BC.

Sean Cary

----- Original Message -----
From: <kirvine@sa*.ne*>
To: Karen Nakamura <karen@gp*.co*>
Cc: <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 1999 3:36 PM
Subject: The Quick and the Dead Release was Re: DIR on RIB's


> Karen, "with all due respect", if you rig the thing properly in the
> first place, this is NOT and issue. It will come off quite easily. I am
> also assuming that the diver is CORRECTLY weighted, and not in steel
> tanks with a wetsuit which would imply the need to overinflate his bc
> JUST to hold him afloat and therefore make it very hard to get the rig
> off without a blowtorch, or that you know how to pop a neckseal to
> relieve a blown-up drysuit.
>
> I am not talking idiots and strokes, I am talking people who have DIR'd
> it from the get-go. I am not interested in how to manage a self-imposed
> Charlie Foxtrot, or how to "fix" some ill-conceived mess. I also do not
> carry a five gallon gas tank on the seat of my car in case I run out - I
> generally put the gas in the main tank.
>
> I saw Jablonski take a drowned diver from 120 feet to the surface after
> traversing 200 horizontal feet of overhead, STRIP his DIR ( 104's ) rig
> from him and get him breathing on the surface with no problem. Bill Mee
> and I blew him with oxygen straight from a reg ( I don't do "rescue
> breaths" on puking victims , I use the reg and power inflate them).
>
> Karen, I do not have time to discuss why doing things like a goober is
> stupid. Sorry. You screw up your whole rig with a Q/R, and be a stroke,
> but we do not allow it in our game, and we do not have to. That part I
> really like, and again, with all due respect, I just do not have time
> for this right now. Do whatever you think is correct, and when that is
> not cutting it, take the cotton out of your ears and look at the WHOLE
> system and see what we see so clearly.
>
> WKPP is back diving, La Nina is making this possible, and for the next
> three months that is all I have time for and all I care about. Talk to
> me then, or call me on the phone if you really want to learn something.
> If you just want to argue, do it away from me. I am not being a prick, I
> am just focused on WKPP for now and do not care what the rest of the
> world is doing at the moment, no matter how ridiculous it is.
>
> And I do mean you can call me anytime - I can tell you in seconds what
> takes me a week to write and have it make a lot more sense in a lot more
> detail. Otherwise I don't think you will hear much of anything out of
> the US WKPP or GUE contingents right now with everyone scrambling to put
> our projects back on track now that Leon Sinks, Wakulla and the rest are
> clearing.
>
> By the way, Karen, Q/R's don't necessarily "fail", they get opened by
> accident, and then you have a problem. What you have done is gravitated
> to the lowest common denominator of diving, and are now trying to use
> that to argue with me. That is not "abusive", it is self-abuse on your
> part. Again, a Q/R is an solution to a self-imposed problem of some
> other kind, that causes more problems of safety that multiply as the
> cicumstances become more severe , and often preclude proper operation
> and positioning of the rest of the gear, and in a nuctshell are the
> trademark of a stroke - like having one of those tatoos that could only
> have been gotten in a drunken stupor. You've seen those, right? That's
> what you look like to me when I see a Q/R or other talisman or amulet of
> abject stupidity and ignorance on somebody's dive gear.
>
> Call me if you want info, otherwise move on. I'm done until the water
> goes dark again other than on my own list. There are tons of people on
> here who know what they are talking about and have the logic perfect,
> like Billy Williams for instance. He can articulate any of this a lot
> better than I can, as can a lot of these guys.
>
> Let me just leave you with this - if the best in the game do it one way,
> and the worst do it another, who are you going to want to get your info
> from? The pros who do it and get the job done with extreme results, or
> the yip-yappers who do jack? Consider your sources.
>
> Karen Nakamura wrote:
> >
> > George -
> >
> > With all due respect, I wonder if we can't continue this conversation a
bit
> > further.
> >
> > One aspect where open water diving differs from cave diving is the
> > possibility of surfacing with an unconscious buddy far away from the
boat or
> > land. In the LGS rescue course I took, we learned how to quickly strip
the
> > unconscious diver of his/her gear and tow them in the do-si-do position
back
> > to safety (while possibly applying rescue breathing).
> >
> > In a cave and/or underwater, yes you can flip the BC over the
unconscious
> > diver's head, but in open water, the best option is to get them to the
> > surface as quickly as possible in order to ascertain ABCs and proceed to
> > rescue breathing if necessary.
> >
> > It's extremely difficult to strip a BC off  an unconscious diver if they
> > don't have quick-releases and/or they're wearing a dry suit. The
standard
> > method (without quick-releases) is to "chicken wing" their hands through
the
> > shoulder harness opening, but if they have dry glove cuffs on, this
could be
> > problematic.
> >
> > Could you give me examples where a quick release was more harm than
help? I
> > haven't heard of a quick release failing in the field, but you
undoubtedly
> > have more experience and would appreciate you sharing that with us.
> >
> > Karen Nakamura
> >
> > ps. nonabusive replies are always appreciated, as well.
> >
> > > Flip it off over your head forward - same for doubles, same for
> > > anything, same for a regular BC, etc. Believe it or not, the basics
> > > still work in diving when the word "tech" is used, and in fact, are
what
> > > keep you alive.
> > >
> > > A "quick release" on a harness is ridiculous. Not only is it a risk
> > > while diving, it impedes correct placement of the rest of the gear. We
> > > do not allow them on any dive gear used in any WKPP dives, if that
tells
> > > you anything.
> > >
> > > Any unnecesary convolution or accommodation to one percieved problem
> > > while not considering the whole picture is an automatic reject.
>
>
> --
> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]