Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 20:56:46
To: techdiver@aquanaut.com
From: billy <bdi@wh*.ne*>
Subject: Re: "Cave Diving Scum Arsehole"???
At 07:25 PM 20/9/99 +0100, innes@di*.pi*.co* wrote:
>You miss the point..
>
>I am frustated by the rudeness and arrogance of some (not all) in Florida.
>
>The best way to make a point is through constructive dialogue.
>
>Sadly the DIR group appear to be more like wild-eyed fanatics to me. They
>rant, swear, intimidate, bully and insult on a regular basis. These people
>(your fellow countrymen) shame our sport.
>
>As for your comments. The Christmas tree diving thing is a common trait in
>UK diving. However, our diving conditions are VERY different from yours.

Innes - there you go again. The usual bankrupt argument. 
Your diving conditions are not that different to ours. 
You've got cold water? We've got cold water. You've got 
poor visibility, we've got poor visibility. You have 
big tides. We have big tides. You've got currents. 
We've got currents. You have nasty short steep seas 
on a long swell. We have short steep seas on a long 
swell. You dive from small boats offshore, we dive from 
small boats affshore. And I've seen our weather turn and 
blow-up nastier and faster than any weather I saw in all 
my years in Britain.

And even if your conditions were somehow different to ours, 
tell me why that wouldn't INCREASE your need for a simpler,
safer, more effective, more streamlined rig?

>Systems have evolved in different places for different reasons. What looks
>silly in one setting, does not in another.

Innes. The Lusitania 99 divers' configurations look
silly ANYWHERE.

There are divers from Scandinavia to the Pacific 
Islands, Africa, the Americas, Asia and Australasia
who dive in a bigger range of more extreme conditions 
than British divers. Guess what? A single well thought 
out, intelligently integrated, low profile system has 
major advantages in all those different conditions, 
leaving the diver more flexible, more mobile, more
capable, less pre-occupied with the equipment when 
diving, and more able to respond to emergencies and 
actively help buddies and him/herself. 

The British 'Christmas-Tree' diver is way behind on 
the evolutionary path. You guys look like amateur
tinkerers. And just because the developments in 
configuration came from the US, some of you poor old 
Brits have got your knickers in a twist and can't 
stand it. That good old British pride makes you guys 
dive looking like junkyard refugees. I've just finished 
reading a book called the Psychology of Military 
Incompetence. It's full of examples of the same stubborn 
British pride; the same astonishing ability to ignore 
reality.

>As a case in point, the UK DIR mob are doing 20 minute bottom times on
>wrecks - in open water , using torches and scooters that can run for hours?

They get more dives between charges. I dive
with a light cannister that lasts from two hours 
to 20 minutes, depending which bulbs I use in it. 
So?

Far from being a burden, the belt-mounted cannister 
light is compact, streamlined, adds no discernible 
resistance to swimming, and serves double duty as 
ballast.

And is your only problem with the Gavins the long 
running times? Or the fact that they were "Not
Invented Here" Tell you what - they wouldn't run
for so long if they had to tow the typical over-
rigged Pommy wreck diver.


>Where is the logic in that? THEY are over burdoned with equipment, which
>wasnt even designed for the environment it is being used in. YET they still
>think they are doing it right........

"THEY are overburdened...." Ha! Wot a larf!

Now tell us what you think about the Lusitania
99 equipment - five tanks on a backplate? How 
about double bungeed wings? How about the sling 
cylinders with reels clipped off to them. The 
long-bodied ride-on Aquazep. Haa!! And the whole 
bizzare mess topped off with valve cages! 

>Arrogance  may well kill them in the
>end....But at least they go to their graves believing they were doing it
>right..

Let me see if I've got this straight. They are
arrogant because they dive efficient, compact,
streamlined gear configurations?

They will die because their equipment is safer
than that of the overburdened mobile scrapyard
style of diver?

>
>I dived the Lusitania on one of Polly expeds..It was a great honour. I have
>dived the Doria (twice) and was on Britannic98..Great times..

Good on ya! Hope you enjoy many more great times. 
I'm envious. Those are superb wrecks. All the best.

rgrds  billyw

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]