Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Paltz, Art" <Art.Paltz@R2*.CO*>
To: techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: RE: Jersey Up Line
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 11:20:04 -0400
Huh? 

George, what did your response have to do with my response?  The point of my
email was that people enjoy diving for different reasons.  You have your
likes which I won't list for you cause I'd probably get it wrong and have my
ass handed to me.  Personally I like wreck diving and recovering artifacts.
In your environment you believe drift diving is safe (which it probably is)
and in my environment I think it isn't (you obviously think it is).

I really don't get the point of your response?  I know you cave dive, I know
you do it safely, this isn't at issue.  I also know you dive in the ocean
and I made no mention of this.  You then took it upon yourself to tell me
your whole life story and what you do.  Although interesting I don't see
what baring it had here other then to rattle and bash me?

Your opinion and mine on the need for an up-line diving in my environment
differ.  We can discuss this all we want, I would just like to stay focused
on this issue for the benefit of everyone.  I'd love to hear the concise
reasons why you believe an up-line isn't needed when diving in NJ/NY.  I
didn't get this form your response.

Art.


		-----Original Message-----
		From:	kirvine@sa*.ne* [mailto:kirvine@sa*.ne*]
		Sent:	Saturday, August 28, 1999 8:31 AM
		To:	Paltz, Art
		Cc:	techdiver@aquanaut.com
		Subject:	Re: Jersey Up Line

		Art, ONE MORE TIME - I am primarily an ocean diver, have
done roughly
		three times as many wreck dives as cave dives, do most of my
diving in
		the ocean, do all types of ocean diving, like to ocean dive,
and only
		cave dive once in a while.

		The reason I cave dive as well as I do is a direct result of
what I
		learned in the ocean. If I can do that like I do it, how
well do you
		think  I do what I do better? HELLO ART????????

		No amount of bullshit will make up for doing it wrong in the
ocean. Cave
		diving requires longer bottom times due to the horitzontal
travel, as if
		you were to have to dive from the dock to get to the wreck.
Cave diving
		allows for low risk decompresion in most cases. Only the
worst idiot
		would sit in the cave doing nothing ( like the usdct did at
Wakulla ) to
		rack up bottom time and face the risk of the deco .

		I live near the ocean, I am in the water every day of my
life, I have
		been diving, boating and swimming all of my life, I have
raced sailboats
		, powoerboats, have taken boats from New York CIty to Ft
Lauderdale off
		shore, have taken boats across the Carribean , have been
diving and
		fishing in remote areas all of my life, my family still has
four boats,
		can diagnose and fix virtually all engine problems or
electricla or
		machanical problems on virtually any boat in minutes( ask
anybody around
		here )and I know for a fact, that you guys have no clue what
you are
		doing, have no understanding of seamanship, have no
understanding of the
		risks, have no clue about the diving ( obviosuly) and have
given it
		little or no thought, but have gone to great lengths to
emulate the
		worst low life boat monkey idiots you can find, and to
believe every
		last thing they told you. GOOD LUCK. YO are going to need it
like so
		many others aht we read about when the bullshit happens and
nobody can
		emplain it because EVERYTHING is being done wrong.

		I'd also like ot know what you hoovering slobs did for
diving tanks when
		80's were the only thing out there. I can not remember doing
a deep
		wreck dive where I even got down to 1000 psi in a set of
80's and that
		is when we were diving on air, and decompressing on that air
weiht no
		other bottles and doing your "25 minutes " of bottom time. I
can
		remember diving a lot longer ( can not remember anything
else about the
		dives) than that spearfishing with Volker on wrecks at 250
and doing the
		entire deco on those 80's and that is when I had what I
consider to be a
		shitty breathing rate.  


		Paltz, Art wrote:
		> 
		> Now, now, we don't throw stones about you crawling into a
big hole in the
		> ground, looking at rocks, taking water samples (real
exciting IMO), then
		> subjecting yourself to a long deco in complete darkness
possibly a really
		> long way from the exit.  To me this is really crazy.  To
me the same holds
		> true drifting along in a current and looking at pretty
fish and coral
		> formations and catching a defenseless lobster with no
claws.  Not trying to
		> start a fight but you're the one who started it commenting
on the things we
		> like to do.  Everyone has their own interest, this makes
us individuals!
		> 
		> Let's not talk about deco obligations and such.  It's a
shame the ocean is
		> so deep and we're forced to perform a 2 hour deco for a
measly 25 minutes on
		> the bottom.
		> 
		> Art.
		> 
		>                 -----Original Message-----
		>                 From:   kirvine@sa*.ne*
[mailto:kirvine@sa*.ne*]
		>                 Sent:   Thursday, August 26, 1999 10:52 PM
		>                 To:     Scaleworks@ao*.co*
		>                 Cc:     ststev@un*.co*; Paltz, Art;
		> techdiver@aquanaut.com
		>                 Subject:        Re: Jersey Up Line
		> 
		>                 Why did we get into the water under thes
conditions in the
		> fist place,
		>                 or why did we stay down so long that they
developed? Is the
		> trash off of
		>                 these wrecks this important - you guys
need to learn when to
		> not dive.
		> 
		>                 I can see that with you guys there is a
"get my money's
		> worth at all
		>                 costs mentality". This is called
sutpidity.
		> 
		>                 Learn to do boat rides and like them, and
come back again.
		> 
		>                 Scaleworks@ao*.co* wrote:
		>                 >
		>                 > n a message dated 99-08-26 04:52:49 EDT,
		> ststev@un*.co* writes:
		>                 >
		>                 >   >There really is no reason to tie into
a wreck for an
		>                 >  ascent.  (For some reason, NY/NJ divers
seem to feel more
		> comfortable
		>                 >  when they're tied to something.  Hmmm,
that could go to
		> explaining the
		>                 >  bondage wings..., but I digress.) <
		>                 >
		>                 > I would seriously think about that one
again. I don't care
		> how good the crew
		>                 > is, I do not want to be floating in the
open ocean in 6'
		> seas hoping they saw
		>                 > my bag surface 300 to 400 ft away in the
whitecaps and
		> spray in an emergency.
		>                 > a 20 minute hang in the current and
rough seas is going to
		> make it very
		>                 > difficult to be found. A bag tied to the
wreck, keeps you
		> on the wreck, the
		>                 > Coast Guard, and dive boat have the GPS
coordinates for
		> the wreck, and know
		>                 > right where to find you. If the boat
broke loose, and 10
		> divers are in the
		>                 > water, they can back off, to avoid
injuring a surfacing
		> diver, and collect
		>                 > everyone in one shot when they surface,
or get close
		> enough for the divers to
		>                 > swim, or send a rescue swimmer with a
tow line.
		>                 >
		>                 > >On wrecks, ordinarily the ascent and
		>                 >  deco is performed along the anchor
line, unless strong
		> current warrants
		>                 >  shooting a bag to do a drifting deco,
or if you return to
		> the anchor
		>                 >  line to find it is not there, you shoot
the bag.  Your
		> surface
		>                 >  personnel should be aware of their
position and if their
		> anchor is
		>                 >  dragging, and have responded
accordingly.   They should
		> have the chase
		>                 >  boat ready and lookouts posted to spot
your bag.  Sound
		> excessive?
		>                 >  Then you are not diving with adequate
surface support.<
		>                 >
		>                 > SOP in the NE, except for drifting deco,
this is not done,
		> jonlines are
		>                 > utilized to deal with excessive current.
The current does
		> not reach speeds
		>                 > experienced in your area.
		>                 >
		>                 >  >As Jim
		>                 >  mentioned, the biodegradeable sisal
line that is
		> typically employed on
		>                 >  the Jersey uplines has a tendency to
become weak and fail
		> at the worst
		>                 >  possible time - in an emergency.
Braided nylon line or
		> equivalent is a
		>                 >  better choice.<
		>                 >
		>                 > Sisal is not typically employed, nor has
been for years,
		> nylon is the choice
		>                 > for it's strength, shock rating, and non
biodegradable
		> characteristics.
		>                 >
		>                 >  >If 1/16 is unsuitable for the
environment, such as in
		>                 >  wrecks, then use larger or more durable
line - just put
		> it on a well
		>                 >  designed reel instead of the Jersey
spool.  The reel is
		> used for laying
		>                 >  line during a penetration, and for
deploying a bag if
		> necessary.  One
		>                 >  tool for two functions - starting to
make sense?  The
		> reel also allows
		>                 >  deployment with one hand only, leaving
one hand free to
		> deal with
		>                 >  emergencies.  It stows easily and
cleanly, and is
		> deployable in
		>                 >  seconds. <
		>                 >
		>                 > Sounds great, now tell me, when you have
300' of line laid
		> from your reel
		>                 > with 350' on it, and an emergency ascent
is called for in
		> 150' of water, how
		>                 > good is that reel to you? I would love
to see the one
		> handed deployment while
		>                 > also dealing with an emergency, how
about concentrate on
		> the emergency first
		>                 > with two hands, and your entire brain,
then get your
		> ascent line in place.
		>                 > I am not saying a reel is not acceptable
for use as an
		> emergency upline, I do
		>                 > and have used mine. However, when a
penetration is called
		> for, or I am
		>                 > running a line on a wreck for navigation
purposes, a
		> single reel cannot be
		>                 > relied on exclusively, a secondary means
of establishing a
		> secure upline is
		>                 > needed. Jersey uplines have also been
configured in recent
		> years to take up
		>                 > no more space than a primary reel, and
there have been a
		> few good threads on
		>                 > here discussing placement and
deployment. The point here
		> is that drifting in
		>                 > the open ocean by choice is not the
proper way to go in an
		> emergency.
		>                 >
		>                 > Kevin
		>                 >
		>                 >
		>                 >
		>                 >
		>                 >
		>                 >
		>                 >
		>                 >  On Wed, 25 Aug 1999 14:09:28 -0400,
Paltz, Art wrote:
		>                 >
		>                 >  >Sean,
		>                 >  >
		>                 >  >I think one of the reasons you don't
see them used is
		> because the divers are
		>                 >  >doing drift diving.  At least for NY
and NJ the reason
		> we have so many great
		>                 >  >wrecks in one concentrated spot is
because this area is
		> the entrance to NY
		>                 >  >and Newark/Elizabeth harbors.
Thinking that an
		> approaching ship is going to
		>                 >  >be able to see your dinky lift bag or
sausage is nuts.
		> The dive boars
		>                 >  >anchor into the wreck site.  Drifting
means the boat's
		> got to pick you up.
		>                 >  >Very difficult to do when the boats
got other divers in
		> the water.
		>                 >  >
		>                 >  >A container ship hit Ambrose Light
tower a few years
		> back.  It stands out of
		>                 >  >the water about 150 feet and is
probably 75 foot by 75
		> foot at the base
		>                 >  >(probably bigger).  If you think
they'll see a free
		> floating bag and worry
		>                 >  >about it you'd be fish food.
		>                 >  >
		>                 >  >Using a wreck reel with 1/16 inch line
on it won't
		> really cut it either.  We
		>                 >  >regularly send up artifacts on bags
and tie them into
		> the wreck with wreck
		>                 >  >or cave line and about 50% of the time
we end up chasing
		> the bag down cause
		>                 >  >the line has been cut on the wreck.  I
don't know about
		> the wrecks in your
		>                 >  >area but in the NE they are all rusty
and sharp.  It's
		> easily cuts through
		>                 >  >thin line quickly.
		>                 >  >
		>                 >  >Some say always use a wreck reel and
tie in near the
		> anchor line.  This is
		>                 >  >also a good option assuming that a).
the anchor line
		> will be there when you
		>                 >  >return and b). your wreck line won't
accidentally be
		> cut.  Anchors come
		>                 >  >dislodged from the wreck even if they
are tied in or
		> have permanent
		>                 >  >moorings.  I've also seen divers get
tangled in others
		> wreck line and
		>                 >  >instead of waiting for their buddy to
untangle them they
		> whip out the knife
		>                 >  >and cut it.  This naturally poses a
problem to the diver
		> expecting the wreck
		>                 >  >line to lead them back to the anchor
line.  I have in
		> this situation re-tied
		>                 >  >the persons wreck line.
		>                 >  >
		>                 >  >Not bashing just giving the reasoning
for carrying an
		> up-reel of some type.
		>                 >  >I really don't want to start up
another "Jersey Up-Reel"
		> thread.  This one
		>                 >  >was tiresome last time.
		>                 >  >
		>                 >  >Art.
		>                 >  >
		>                 >  >
		>                 >  >      -----Original Message-----
		>                 >  >      From:   Sean T. Stevenson
		> [mailto:ststev@un*.co*]
		>                 >  >      Sent:   Wednesday, August 25,
1999 1:41 AM
		>                 >  >      To: goindown@be*.ne*
		>                 >  >      Cc: George Irvine; Jim Cobb;
		> techdiver@aquanaut.com
		>                 >  >      Subject:    Re: Jersey Up Line
		>                 >  >
		>                 >  >      I can't tell if this is a tongue
in cheek
		> sarcastic reply or
		>                 >  >if this
		>                 >  >      guy really didn't get the joke.
If it is the
		> latter case,
		>                 >  >might I
		>                 >  >      suggest quitting diving and
taking up golf...
		>                 >  >
		>                 >  >      Chris, seriously...  these
upline reels are
		> completely
		>                 >  >unnecessary.
		>                 >  >      I'm guessing you are diving on
the Atlantic coast?
		> Take a
		>                 >  >look at how
		>                 >  >      everyone else in the world does
this and ask
		> yourself why
		>                 >  >you do not
		>                 >  >      see these upline reels used
anywhere else.
		>                 >  >
		>                 >  >      -Sean
		>                 >  >
		>                 >  >
		>                 >  >      On Tue, 24 Aug 1999 17:18:55
-0400, Chris Gregory
		> wrote:
		>                 >  >
		>                 >  >      >Would that same buddy be there
to retrieve it
		> should you
		>                 >  >need to shoot a
		>                 >  >      >bag, and if he's not available
what are the "DIR"
		>                 >  >alternatives?
		>                 >  >      >Chris
		>                 >  >      >
		>                 >  >      >
		>                 >  >
		>                 >  >
		>                 >  >   >>
		>                 > --
		>                 > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing
list to
		> `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
		>                 > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to
		> `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
		> --
		> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to
`techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
		> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to
`techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
		
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]