skip wrote: Hello >HELLO >HEEEEELLLOOOO. >GRANT!! > >Are you listening? > >I would guess at least 10-12 members (myself included, in a number of >posts, written as logically and politely as I could manage) have explained >that the DIR message has been given repeatedly, in detail, with diagrams, >logical explanations, ad infinitum. Where?, don't just say "we did it", tell me where, so I can read them Guess what? The unrepentant strokes >respond exactly the way you are responding to all the posts trying to >answer your repeated bleating. > >To summarize, the response from the confirmed DIW (Doing It Wrong for the >slow starters) crowd to polite logic is typically "huh" or sometimes "duh" >and always ignoring the logic. This seems to be the direction your replies >have taken I hear lots of people saying "we KEEP telling people", I dont want to hear that, I want to know what you've told them, so how about directions to where its wrote down, taped, or otherwise recorded. .. I cannot decided if you have a reading comprehension problem, >if you are just one of the deep air diving morons masquerading as an >enquiring mind to stir the pot a little, Wrong, no deep air here, I stay well within my limits or just masochistic and needed a >little on line abuse. I certainly don't need it......... Whichever, the bottom line is you are ignoring the >message and content of every response to your complaints and keep repeating >the same tired whine, "all the DIR guys are soooo mean, no one can ever >listen". So give me sources, then I can leave the insults behind and go learning And you wonder why some get exasperated and resort to profanity >and more? Not really, I've met many yanks......... Grant > >At 06:24 PM 8/22/99 +0100, you wrote: >> >> If it was b/, then you would proberly have a very bloody nose, why not >>just explain the difference and tell people of their faults, I.e. people >>have been killed wearing this model - fairly straight forward, don't you >>think? >> >> Grant >>-----Original Message----- >>From: bdi@wh*.ne* <bdi@wh*.ne*> >>To: techdiver <techdiver@aquanaut.com> >>Date: 22 August 1999 08:37 >>Subject: Re: Slick of GRants >> >> >>>At 12:39 AM 22/8/99 +0100, Grant Jones wrote: >>> >>>> Is it any wonder that dir is so slow getting off the >>>>ground, with this sort of attitude, towards people who want >>>>to learn about it? >>> >>>I've been meaning to speak to you about the attitude, Grant. >>>You really ought to open up a little. Look and learn instead >>>of ducking and weaving. Otherwise your attitude is going to >>>get someone killed. Probably one of your students. >>> >>>And while we're on the subject of ducking and weaving, you >>>still haven't answered the question.... >>> >>>>>Grant, which do you find more insulting... >>>>> >>>>>a) I tell you you're a great guy while I sell you a set of bungy >>>>>wings that *I* know (and you don't) have been implicated in several >>>>>diving deaths, or >>>>> >>>>>b) I tell you you're a long-stroke, dipshit wanker if you dive >>>>>and recommend bungy wings that let go the OP valve before they >>>>>inflate fully and have been implicated in at least three deaths. >>>>> >>> >>>rgds billyw >>>-- >>>Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. >>>Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. >>> >> >> >> >> >>-- >>Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. >>Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. >> > > -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]