"John R. Rose" wrote: > > > - Todd > > > > p.s. It's pretty sad that naughty words and abrasiveness get > > people more agitated than a pile of corpses. It really > > seems like that would be enough... > > > > -- > > Yeah Todd, > > Unfortuantely, too many get their knickers in a twist over Trey's > naughty words. In most cases, people are simply arguing with the > delivery since they are unable to argue convincingly with the content > of the message. Rather sad, don't you think? You're not listening. I don't think that anybody in this thread is disagreeing with George's message. In fact, it seems that everybody has said they agree with it. They (we) just feel that his message would be more widely accepted if it was packaged better. Is that so hard to understand? An "attack" on George's methods of communication is NOT an attack on the WKPP, GUE, DIR methods, etc. It is just some people pointing out that in their opinion the message would be more accepted if it was put out in a better package. If we lose the emotion and defensiveness while we're discussing this issue, we'd probably get more accomplished. Go ahead and get emotional when there is an accident, but when it comes time to discuss it, and try and find solutions you need to drop the emotion and use logic. Sincerely, -- Kevin Metcalfe metcalfe@ec*.co* Pleasant Hill, CA -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]