Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Bartolucci, Ivan Jorge" <ibartolucci@wa*.fr*>
To: "Stuart Morrison" <divebimbo@li*.fr*.co*.uk*>
Cc: "TechDiver" <TechDiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: Re: Hugo's contribution
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 17:27:39 +0200
Hi Stuart

>In the sixties everybody used tanks with reserve valves and no pressure
>gauges with quite good safety results too. Superficially they work well,
>but what of the internal damage they cause? In the last couple of years
>there has been evidence of lesions and nerve damage in divers coming to
>light.

I'm not aware of those evidences, do you have references, please?

> Haldanean theory, which Buehlmann is based on, is a century old, and
>in the last ten years we have learned that there are better ways.

The last thread about Zplan seems to prove not so many rely on the better
ways, though...

>Try Bruce Wienke's paper on the subject.

I'll read it. Thanks for the info.

As for the
>drysuit question -- ever tried argon? Does no-one weld in Egypt?

No need for a dry suit here, and air temperature wouldn't make their use
very comfortable.

>Slowing your ascent from intermediate depths is almost the same as deep
>stops. Deep stops are more effective. Why not use them?

OK. I admit that I virtually use them when I do a slow ascent from 50M, and
more exactly when I do any more challenging dive.

  I don't mind being wrong, if you're always right you never learn. But
before I believe someone who goes against the mainstream and my own
experience, I must check seriously, specially if the theoretical and
empirical back-up is slim. And whenever someone shouts at me... I think he
doesn't have enough arguments to convince.

Regards.

Hugo.



-----Message d'origine-----
De : Stuart Morrison <divebimbo@li*.fr*.co*.uk*>
À : Bartolucci, Ivan Jorge <ibartolucci@wa*.fr*>
Cc : TechDiver <TechDiver@aquanaut.com>
Date : jeudi 10 juin 1999 01:13
Objet : Re: Hugo's contribution


>> Haldanean models seem to work not so bad, as virtually everybody still
>uses
>> them with quite good safety results.
>
>In the sixties everybody used tanks with reserve valves and no pressure
>gauges with quite good safety results too. Superficially they work well,
>but what of the internal damage they cause? In the last couple of years
>there has been evidence of lesions and nerve damage in divers coming to
>light. Haldanean theory, which Buehlmann is based on, is a century old, and
>in the last ten years we have learned that there are better ways.
>
>> I'm interested in that VPM model, where can I get more information?
>
>Try Bruce Wienke's paper on the subject.
>
>> I use Pyle stops everytime I do Tx dives. I've never done any Tx dive
>> without them, so I actually can't tell the difference.
>> But in the case of that famous 50M/20mn air profile, I don't feel much
>> difference, specially if you use a somewhat conservative deco profile.
>
>Again, latest research shows that stopping deeper is more conservative than
>increasing shallow stops arbitrarily. In ten years maybe you will start to
>feel different when bone necrosis puts you in a wheelchair. If you haven't
>got bent first.
>
>>
>> >Helium is a far friendlier gas than nitrogen too.
>>
>>  I'm not sure He is  that much friendlier if you fail to empty your
>drysuit
>> after a 54M dive, as it seems to happen. Probably the opposite as He
>comes
>> out of solution faster than N2.
>
>That's the very reason helium is friendlier -- it comes out of solution
>more readily than N2 and tissues have a greater tolerance of it. As for the
>drysuit question -- ever tried argon? Does no-one weld in Egypt?
>
>> >Why? MOD for EAN50 is 22m, EAN80 is 9m. Why do you need such an added
>> >range? What kind of profile are you diving that the contingencies are
>going
>> >to push your first stop 13m deeper? I thought you didn't believe in deep
>> >stops? Or is it so you can get in the water with no planning and do
>> >whatever your computer says at the end of the dive?
>>
>> After the dive we're talking about, wouldn't a slow ascent with Nx50
>since
>> 20M be acceptably safe?
>
>Slowing your ascent from intermediate depths is almost the same as deep
>stops. Deep stops are more effective. Why not use them?
>
>
>
>> OK. Dive deep on air should stop as soon as you reach your limits, which
>can
>> be 30M to 60M depending on your training, experience, personnal
>preference
>
>Old ground -- other people have said it better than I can.
>
>> and sensitivity. Use deep stops whenever they become useful, but don't
>use
>> heavy tools when unnecessary.
>
>Doing deep stops in no way is endangering your safety, nor adds to task
>loading, stress, or causes any other problem other than accepting that you
>are wrong.
>
>Regards,
>
>S
>
>
>
>
>


--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]