Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: Graeme
To: Davison <graeme_davison@ma*.ne*.co*>
Subject: Re: Dive Depths and Nitrox
From: Richard Pyle <deepreef@bi*.bi*.ha*.or*>
Cc: TechDiver <techdiver@opal.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 1994 11:42:15 +22305714 (HST)
On 6 Dec 1994, Graeme Davison wrote:

> I was taught that deep first still applies
> 
> On a similar topic I was taught that when mixing Air and Nitrox dives on the
> same day - the recomendation was to do the Air dive first - Any body else got
a
> view ??

It seems to me that it ought to be the deepest EAD dive first, not
necessarily the deepest actual depth dive.  They could be different,
especially if the air dive is done first.

Imagine an air dive to 25msw and a nitrox-36 dive to 30msw.  The EAD of
the latter is 22+msw, so the air dive ought to be done first, even though
it's shallower.  However, given that both gases can be used on both dives,
I haven't sat down to figure out which sequence gives you more total bottom
time.  I suspect that using the n-36 at 20msw and air at 30msw would give
more TOTAL bottom time (though shifted towards the shallow dive), but it
would depend on which dive is done first.  I'm too busy right now, but
somone should run a series of test profiles, using all four combinations
of depth and gas sequence (keeping all else constant), to see how to
maximize underwater time (or conversly, minimize tissue loading for fixed
dive times).  Perhaps try with a series of SI times?  I dunno....who out
there is bored? ;-)

Aloha,
Rich

deepreef@bi*.bi*.ha*.or*

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]