Ian, If tracking the uptake and elimination of 2 inert gases is "dodgy", then it really does not matter wheither you dive with Trimix or with Heliox, as in each case we have to track 2 inert gases as to uptake and elimination. In the trimix case, we are tracking helium and nitrogen uptake and elimination both due to the breathing gas, and due to the tissue staturation with nitrogen at approx. 0.75bar. Thus, some compartments will be taking up both nitrogen and helium during the dive, some will be taking up helium and eliminating nitrogen during various phases of the dive, etc. With a heliox dive, we must track the elimination of nitrogen during the dive (again, we start the dive out with all compartments staturated with 0.75bar nitrogen when we leave the surface), as well having to track helium uptake and elimination. As to trimix and DCS, the major projects (ie, Wakulla Springs; Sullivan Sink/Emerald Sink; Eagles Nest; and DiPolder II) have had exemplary safety records, with NO DCS reported. However, trying to compare these safety records to the vast majority of technical divers is more difficult, as we have a large number of different tables in use, with different safety factors figured into the tables. Technical divers have developed DCS, but we have no central clearing house to allow anykind of estimation of risk or incidence. Hope this helps - John Submariner Research, Ltd. (johncrea@de*.co*)
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]