Halcyon 65# explorer wings. Period. At 06:36 AM 10/22/98 -0700, you wrote: >its time for a new bc to be used exclusively for doubles; I have been using >the seatec in one form or another for the last 10 years, and the diverite >the two years before that. > >Any comments on which size to get? the current choices seem to be #45 and >#65 pounds of lift. The seatec worked well, but was marginal on lift; I >don't want to go any lighter and would prefer an extra #5 or so lbs. lift. >The default is the #65 model, but if I could get away with the 45 I would >prefer that. > >Any idea what the lift capacity is on the seatec? this is for comparison >purposes. > >Comments on why I should or shouldn't go with the 45? > >Any personal preferences are welcome, but this is a question of LIFT, not >brand. The 45 would seem to be enough, but I don't want to buy it and find >it wont work. > >as far as equipment; I dive with RENTED doubles, so they are either steel or >aluminum, random brands, etc. dependent upon who has what when I show up to >dive (in Fla. or Mexico; cant fly doubles very well from California). The >seatec seemed to work well on everything up to steel 104s and a single stage >bottle, but it was FULL with that setup and had NO margin. > >My leaning now is to get the 65 and forget about it....... > >thanks. > >mark > ----------------------------- Kevin Connell <kevin@nw*.co*> NW Labor Systems http://www.nwls.com ----------------------------- -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]