Narced wrote: > > Garrett, > > Let's turn off the smoke screen and try to address the real question which > started this whole thread.. > > It is utterly moronic to use a nitrox mix with a max. po2 that limits your > depth to 130, while the actual max. depth of the site is 170ft. > > The purpose of dive planning is to minimize the risks. By planning the > above profile, your delibertly increasing the risk factor, and failing to > utilize the rules for survival. > > If your not willing or capable of utilizing a proper trimix mix, then > atleast use air as your bottom mix. That way, you negate the risk of a > high po2 scenerio; and must only deal with the risk of having your head up > your ass the entire dive due to the narcossis. > > Again, this is basic stuff boys & girls. If theres anyone following this > thread who can't comprehend why the suggested dive plan of using nitrox > should be deep-sixed, would you kindly submit your instructors name to > Kevin so he can put them on the shit list. > > Safe Diving > > At 11:25 20/09/1998 -0700, scubait@ix*.ne*.co* wrote: > > >And, if you remeber correctly, my example was a shore dive with a slope > that oculd > >reach 500 feet. Should open water students be diving there? That's the > question I > >addressed. > > > >Where do we draw the line? > > > >Garrett Weinberg > > > > Sid.Dive@Ib*.Ne* > Toronto, Canada > > -- > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. And what would the "proper" mix be for a 100' dive on a wall that bottoms at 14,000'? Yeah, I thought so!!! Get a clue! -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]