Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: "Mr I.M. Horsfall" <imh@li*.ac*.uk*>
Subject: Re: Wings
From: Richard Pyle <deepreef@bi*.bi*.ha*.or*>
Cc: techdiver@opal.com
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 1994 17:14:39 +22305714 (HST)
On Tue, 15 Nov 1994, Mr I.M. Horsfall wrote:

> What I want to know, preferably from people who have experience of more 
> than one make, is which make is the best for the price (the Uk price will
> be different, but the difference between makes will be similar), which is
> most comfortable to wear (I have a neoprene drysuit), which has the easiest
> tank attachment to use and is a double bag model worth the extra.

I started out with an original Dive-Rite Single bladder Wings B.C., and
was very impressed with its quality.  I recently purchased an OMS
dual-bladder B.C. (wings-style), and am EXTREMELY impressed with its
quality.  The two-bladders-in-one-shell offers (in my opinion) the perfect
compromise between redundancy and compact design.  Add to that the elastic
bands which keep the deflated B.C. very streamline, and you've got a very
good piece of dive equipment. It also allows several dump options, and
two sets of holes to mount to the backplate.

I've heard that Dive-Rite has/will soon introduce a dual-bladder,
single-shell wings-style B.C. with elastic bands, but I don't know
anything about it.

I have no first-hand experience with the Zeagle, but several people I know
who have used them have told me they don't think they're as good. (But
that's second-hand info)

Aloha,
Rich


deepreef@bi*.bi*.ha*.or*

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]