Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1998 15:42:43 -0500
To: techdiver@aquanaut.com
From: s_lindblom@co*.co* (Steve Lindblom)
Subject: Re: DIR strokes was Re: A Call to Arms

><< . Octopus on bungy
> neck strap. >>
>
>OCTOPUS???? DIR uses octopus??? NE Strokes like redundant air supply......tell
>me what happens with out of air situation with an octopus???? twice as much
>out of air???

BDI, you will note, never says DIR - he used the phrase "hogarthian
inspired" which seems accurate.

Still, one has to question whether a rig like this is a logical stepping
stone to DIR, or blantant strokery.

It has been said here many times, that DIR is a system, and that change one
element and it may not any longer be DIR. Redundancy - clean, uncomplicated
redundancy that doesn't increase task loading - is the at the core of the
system, and the isolator manifold and long hose the key to that. This
"hogarthian inspired" setup has neither long hose nor redundant air. Dive
it without the wings, and there's no redundant buoyancy either.

Nothing necessarily wrong with this - most rec diving is done without
either - but giving as it does, an illusion of DIR without the substance,
it could be argued that rigs like this, on OW divers, may be trivializing
and diluting the DIR message.

 Jacket BC's are not inherently evil - as Jim recently pointed out, they
are often preferable with a single tank. With an alu single, they are also
much more likely to float a diver face up on the surface, a serious
consideration, especially with OW's.


--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]