Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: <GarlooEnt@ao*.co*>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1998 06:58:27 EDT
To: dlv@ga*.ne*, wrolf@co*.ne*, bdi@wh*.ne*
Cc: JSGomes117@ao*.co*, techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: Re: The noise level and misdirection
dan
many years ago i used to teach in a high school that had drug problems with
the students. so it's not without experience in this area that i say that your
analogy is quite floored. 
in that school system the powers that be felt that they should ignore the
problem with regard to educating the students as to the ills of the drugs(i.e.
show them the results of there actions by bringing them to rehb centers, or
have past drug addicts discuss the problem with them). they took the hard line
- they threatened them with punishment instead - this resulted in two deaths
do to overdoses that i personally witnessed of course the powers that be
blamed every one & everything else for the deaths.
you have some good points with regard to wrolfs comments & he has raised some
valid questions. why don't you & he just answer each others queries & move on
from there. it probably would be a lot easier that threatening each other.
hank


In a message dated 8/26/98 10:36:37 AM Pacific Daylight Time, dlv@ga*.ne*
writes:

<< Subj:	 RE: The noise level and misdirection
 Date:	8/26/98 10:36:37 AM Pacific Daylight Time
 From:	dlv@ga*.ne* (Dan Volker)
 To:	wrolf@co*.ne* ('Wrolf Courtney'), bdi@wh*.ne* ('bdi')
 CC:	JSGomes117@ao*.co*, techdiver@aquanaut.com
 
 Wrolf,
 
 You are still whining about free speech, like it justifies the
 misdirections, obsfucation, and confusion your posts generate.
 
 
 I'll make another analogy for you, to make it easier for you to understand
 why many of us really don't want you posting here anymore.
 
 Let's say you are a senior in highschool, or a freshman in college. You are
 in a small school, and you your class is about 100 students---you know all
 of them. Ten students you know have been taking LSD, and coke, and are
 trying to convince other students it gives them a huge advantage in
 creativity---very useful in writing, art and even understanding of science.
 And they say the cocaine will allow you to study for 8 hours per day, during
 exam weeks, with no effort. And you retain, as long as you use the coke to
 take the test. And another benefit they claim is more enjoyable athletic
 workouts. They claim the right to free speech. They claim its their right to
 tell the other students about "their way".
 
 
 You know from the last school you were in, several students--friends, that
 died from exactly what these ten are now doing. You know, with ABSOLUTE
 CERTAINTY, that the course of action these students are suggesting to the
 remaining 90 of your friends, will "kill"  some of them in the next few
 months.  You know that "the ten"  are very persuasive, and that other
 friends are listening to them. You  have told your other  friends how
 dangerous this course of action is, but the ten have convinced everyone that
 no "proof" exists for  your position----and it has become their word against
 your word. But you "know" the real truth. This is absolute certainty. And it
 has been proven, again and again.
 
 
 You now have decided "the ten" need to either be kicked out of the school
 before they kill someone with their ideas, or they need to shut their mouths
 and stop trying to lead others down their path.  You have effectively
 decided AGAINST free speech.
 
 If you decided that they should be allowed to continue their attempts to
 convince many of your friends to take drugs you know will kill some of them,
 because of your belief in free speech---you are no friend to anyone. You are
 as bad if not worse than the drug peddlers--because you actually KNOW who
 dangerous the practice is, but refuse to act on your knowledge.
 
 
 This is why many of us have opposed Wrolf Courtney participation on this
 tech list----we know your ideas will confuse and misdirect new tech divers,
 at a critical time in their lives when they may have precious little time
 left to find the right "path" too safe technical diving. Each day you
 misdirect and confuse them, you come closer to killing these novice tech
 divers, by preventing them from adopting the DIR procedures and
 configurations of gear that would have protected them.  This is why I see
 you like the drug peddler, and why I want you OUT OF HERE.
 This is why I can't be "Nice" or polite to you anymore.   If I ran into a
 crack dealer at a Seven Eleven convenience store, and saw him trying to sell
 crack to a friend of mine's son, you can believe he would be beaten to a
 pulp, on the spot. This is an absolute responsibility--one which we all
 share.
 Wrolf, at this time, each of us has a responsibility to give you a "virtual
 beating", in response to behavior by you ---which we know is potentially
 going to contribute to a technical diving death, by the mechanisms already
 discussed.
 
 Keep it up, and I can foresee some of us feeling the need to go beyond a
 your "virtual beating", in our attempts to save lives which you are now
 jeopardizing. Whether this becomes legal/financial, or  physical, only time
 and your future postings will determine.
 
 Wrolf, you are placing us in a position where we are morally compelled to
 make an action---one which you will not enjoy. Wake up, see what you have
 been doing from our perspective, and change immediately. You are NOT a
 champion of free speech----you are a source of dangerous misdirection in
 technical diving, one which may kill a diver  very soon.  How can you expect
 us to treat any way other than the way you've been treated so far, or much
 worse in the future.
 
 Dan Volker
  >>
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]