bill a few questions & some points of knowledge for you- first off what is wrong with your e-mail all od the   & <div> and whatever other nonsensiclal inserts are making it very dificult to read your posts (is it me or is it your server??) now getting back to the unfortunate demise of Richard- he didn't need to run a reel into the wreck since there were already 2 permanent lines there. i never said nor implied that his penetration was any accomplishmnet at all. it was just what he did. you & most cave divers miss the point- with wreck diving & artifact recovery - that even if you ran a line you would probably have to put it down at some point to dig & retrieve artifacts. you might clip it off to yourself only to find that you have had to turn around three times to retrieve something & be totaly wraped up in your line in the middle of a silt out, you might tie it off to a spot & not be able to find it again anyway. in richards case you are wrong the levels were not the same. & in order to get out of the lounge he needed only to go right or left & then up. but he would have known that if he came in that way or if he had been there before or if he had more time. but none of those were the case. i don't know that he actually (at this point in time neither do you know for certain)that he took any drug -dramamine or whatever. i do know that the day this happened the ocean was flat calm & i would find it hard to believe that he would have had to ingest much of any sea sickness drug(however some people do get sick at the drop of a hat)to have the desired affects. does dramamine have any effect on performance at depth?? i don't know I have never used it but there are no studies on this to back your feelings(& that is all they are at this point). think about this one (it's only a guess on my part). you have someone over 100 feet into a wreck & he has lost the line that he followd in. add to the fact that he has no real experience in that particular wreck. now add the next link in the chain of events he manages to travel into another level of the wreck totaly unfamiliar to him & has no immediatly visable exit. lets stop a minute here- at what point do you think he starts to get excited & scared shitless. whaen do you think he starts to breath at an excesive rate. maybe at a rate that causes him to hyperventalate. now maybe if he took the damamine it has some effect- but don't you think it is just possible that bcause the poor guy got lost he toxed on co2 or even o2 (his mix was a little rich) & that's all there is to it. he passed out & ran out of gas unconcious. now there is no place other than diver error to point the finger at - you can call him stupid if you like for a lot of it but the bottom line is that he is gone & he made a few too many mistakes. the most important on in my opinion was: he pushed himself to far to soon in gaining experience on the wreck. he was actually not ready for the penetration he attempted.(could he have accomplished it -yes but he would have been lucky) the underlying motivation to this is greed to get something. i am not degrading him for this - he did nothing more than many of us have done at different times in our careers,this was the time the bear bit him. BTW bill i am not saying you are totaly incorrect it's just that there are other possibilities that result in the same ending. hank In a message dated 8/13/98 11:22:28 PM Pacific Daylight Time, aquadart@ix*.ne*.co* writes: << Subj: Re: Richard Roost: Dead on the Doria (YOU WON'T BELIVE WHY!!) Date: 8/13/98 11:22:28 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: aquadart@ix*.ne*.co* (Bill Bott) To: GarlooEnt@ao*.co*, gzambeck@us*.ne* CC: techdiver@aquanaut.com <div>Hank,</div> <div>If you follow my posts at all you know that I answer resonablequestions with a reasonable reply. I have to admit that I can notput a percentage on it. It may have been the sole reason. Butit also may have been a contributing factor. I do know that Richardwas NOT runing a line. He was also found in the main hallwayleading from the first class lounge. I was of the impresion thatthe location he was found was on the same level that he entered. Also following "lines" for about 100' before getting disorentedor lost is not what I would call any acomplishment!! In fact Iwould call such a performance dismal at best. But I do not knowthat is what happened.</div> <div>Although I don't see any problem with penitrating solo, I have donesolo wreck penitration well below 200', the fact that he did not have abuddy present means that no living person KNOWS exactly whathappened. My bet is that he blacked out then sucked his back gasdry. I doubt that he had any idea that there was any thingwrong.</div> <div>At 09:10 PM 8/13/98 , GarlooEnt@ao*.co* wrote:</div><div>>bill</div><div>>i really don't wish to get into the middle of this pissingcontest. </div><div>>just a question. </div><div>>if in fact richard used dramamine before the dive how much ofthe results</div><div>>would you attribute to his demise?</div><div>>he managed to aparently follow the lines about 100 ft into thewreck get</div><div>>dissorientated & find his way though to another level that(by the way does</div><div>>not have an apparent exit. at which point he ran out of back gas(or fell</div><div>>asleep??).</div><div>>this just a question not a statement.</div><div>>hank</div> <x-html>Bill <aquadart> Bott >> -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]