Mike,
The overall implications of my post were in line with "defending" the
"watchdogs" of the list, for posting and response styles which newcomers
frequently interpret as "mean spirited" and "uncalled for" ---I'm saying it
IS called for. Sugar coating a reply to someone who may kill others by the
influence of  their opinions, would be "polite", but it would not be in the
best interests of the sport.
If you are on a charter boat, and the diver on your left, is trying to
persuade the diver on your right to go for a personal deep air
record----smack the moron ( at least figuratively :-)
And we have the same duty here.
Regards,
Dan



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Zimmerman [mailto:zimmmt@au*.al*.co*]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 1998 3:09 PM
> To: Dan Volker
> Subject: Re: "Dangerous on the Net".
>
>
> and let offer too Dan that I know the intentions are good, hell
> it'd be great
> that no one gets hurt anywhere, I simply do not believe the method works.
> Nor do I really think this proposed squashing of opposing viewpoints
> to be in the long term best interest of the sport.
>
> Mike
>

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]