Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Jess Armantrout" <armantrout@wo*.at*.ne*>
To: "pH" <heseltine@ea*.ne*>
Cc: <cavers@ca*.co*>, <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: Re: Here's the point!
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 1998 18:48:43 -0500
Great point, it is just wrong.  Maybe for typical RB exposures, which
probably don't really require deco anyway, but not for serious exposures
like those encountered in long range mixed gas cave exploration dives,
a.k.a., the WKPP.  Our lungs just can't take the beating, and if you lower
the PPo2 to a point where we can, well then what is the point?  Pete, if
you had done any of these dives, you would know this.  Your math goes right
out the window when your chest hurts every time you take a deep breath. It
is just THAT simple.

Been there, done that, learned better,
Trout

----------
> From: pH <heseltine@ea*.ne*>
> To: RLatulip@ao*.co*
> Cc: kirvine@sa*.ne*; cavers@ca*.co*; techdiver@aquanaut.com
> Subject: Here's the point!
> Date: Monday, August 03, 1998 4:47 PM
> 
> Ray - 
> 
> This really isn't about electronics. You can believe they will kill you
and
> I can believe that they usually will not. Forget the electronics for a
> moment - I can fly my machine manually. So now, tell me you don't believe
> in the Geo Tooth Fairy who will save you from deco with a handful of
pills
> and a stiff workout. I think/know/math/reason that a higher pO2 short of
> toxicity is a better choice for deco. It's that simple.
> 
> pH
> 
> 
> At 05:27 PM 8/3/98 -0400, RLatulip@ao*.co* wrote:
> >In a message dated 8/3/98, 4:41:30 PM, heseltine@ea*.ne* writes:
> >
> ><<Ray - This is hogwash and you know it! Sooner or later we will ALL
die
and
> >so will our machinery. Debating the relative merits of MTBF of your air
> >computer (whose battery you probably didn't check before the dive), an
> >SC-RB and OC is not the point. They ALL fail, occasionally. But, you are
> >changing the subject.
> >>>
> >
> >Give me a %^$# break all failures had nothing to do with the battery
> rather it
> >started telling me I had twice the gas I had when I started and for your
> >information it was not an air computer and it was supposed to monitor my
> >breathing rate as well which it did like shit. The point is not that it
is a
> >computer but that it is a device that contains electronics you moron.
And
> >secondly if they all fail occasionally all the better to not be
depending on
> >them to maintain your PO2.  I would rather die old and dreaming about
the
> >dives I used to do than young and leaving behind a widow.  
> >
> >Electronics in a circuit are only as good as the components the vendor
sends
> >you and if you think that their quality control is %100 all the time
then you
> >are living in a fantasy world.  Did you sit there and run an
oscilloscope on
> >every component to ensure that it met the specifications that it was
> supposed.
> >
> >Having tested power supplies for I.B.M. for several years and having had
to
> >analyze the fallout I still will not bet my life on an electronic
circuit.
> >
> >>>>The fundamental issue, which Geo refuses to address with any logic or
> >scientific rationale, is why would you believe a guy that tells you that
> >swallowing a few vitamin pills and doing works outs 'til you have
> >buns-o'-steel makes you invulnerable to the basic laws of gasses and
> >physiology?<<<
> >
> >No the fundamental issue is who will be the next to die on an electronic
> >rebreather!
> >
> >Ray LaTulippe
> > 
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]