Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Errol Kalayci" <errol@ga*.ne*>
To: <RLatulip@ao*.co*>, "pH" <heseltine@ea*.ne*>
Cc: <kirvine@sa*.ne*>, <cavers@ca*.co*>, <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: Re: Here's the point!
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1998 19:51:14 -0400
Thanks Heseltine,
I have to wipe ice tea off the screen from reading your post.  You can't be
serious?
Errol
-----Original Message-----
From: pH <heseltine@ea*.ne*>
To: RLatulip@ao*.co* <RLatulip@ao*.co*>
Cc: kirvine@sa*.ne* <kirvine@sa*.ne*>; cavers@ca*.co*
<cavers@ca*.co*>; techdiver@aquanaut.com <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Date: Monday, August 03, 1998 7:11 PM
Subject: Here's the point!


>Ray -
>
>This really isn't about electronics. You can believe they will kill you and
>I can believe that they usually will not. Forget the electronics for a
>moment - I can fly my machine manually. So now, tell me you don't believe
>in the Geo Tooth Fairy who will save you from deco with a handful of pills
>and a stiff workout. I think/know/math/reason that a higher pO2 short of
>toxicity is a better choice for deco. It's that simple.
>
>pH
>
>
>At 05:27 PM 8/3/98 -0400, RLatulip@ao*.co* wrote:
>>In a message dated 8/3/98, 4:41:30 PM, heseltine@ea*.ne* writes:
>>
>><<Ray - This is hogwash and you know it! Sooner or later we will ALL die
and
>>so will our machinery. Debating the relative merits of MTBF of your air
>>computer (whose battery you probably didn't check before the dive), an
>>SC-RB and OC is not the point. They ALL fail, occasionally. But, you are
>>changing the subject.
>>>>
>>
>>Give me a %^$# break all failures had nothing to do with the battery
>rather it
>>started telling me I had twice the gas I had when I started and for your
>>information it was not an air computer and it was supposed to monitor my
>>breathing rate as well which it did like shit. The point is not that it is
a
>>computer but that it is a device that contains electronics you moron. And
>>secondly if they all fail occasionally all the better to not be depending
on
>>them to maintain your PO2.  I would rather die old and dreaming about the
>>dives I used to do than young and leaving behind a widow.
>>
>>Electronics in a circuit are only as good as the components the vendor
sends
>>you and if you think that their quality control is %100 all the time then
you
>>are living in a fantasy world.  Did you sit there and run an oscilloscope
on
>>every component to ensure that it met the specifications that it was
>supposed.
>>
>>Having tested power supplies for I.B.M. for several years and having had
to
>>analyze the fallout I still will not bet my life on an electronic circuit.
>>
>>>>>The fundamental issue, which Geo refuses to address with any logic or
>>scientific rationale, is why would you believe a guy that tells you that
>>swallowing a few vitamin pills and doing works outs 'til you have
>>buns-o'-steel makes you invulnerable to the basic laws of gasses and
>>physiology?<<<
>>
>>No the fundamental issue is who will be the next to die on an electronic
>>rebreather!
>>
>>Ray LaTulippe
>>
>--
>Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
>Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
>

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]