Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Ken Sallot" <ken@co*.ci*.uf*.ed*>
Organization: CIRCA, University of Florida
To: techdiver@aquanaut.com
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 1998 13:11:27 EST
Subject: (Fwd) Re: THREE MORE DEEP AIR DEATHS
George,

The deaths in West Palm Beach was apparently a charlie foxtrot on a 
trimix training dive, not deep air. However, from what I've been told 
by reliable sources, you're probably looking at another fine example 
of people trying to progress into technical diving too far, too fast. 

>From what I have been told, the student who passed away had travelled 
to West Palm to take this trimix course, and probably did not have 
much experience in "technical diving".

I have also been told that the surviving diver last saw the two 
instructors trying to manage convulsions on the student diver. 
Apparently the student had buoyancy problems in deco and dropped to a 
deeper depth on a high nitrox (80/20). What caused the buoyancy 
problems? I can't tell you.

All speculations should be left alone for the time being until a 
recovery is done. However, there is one definate thing that can be 
learned from this accident without the bodies; progressing too 
quickly into advanced forms of technical diving can prove fatal. 

I would hope there's not an instructor in the world who would 
disagree that gaining experience between each phase of training is a 
necessity, but we all know that is not the case. 

As long as "technical diving" is promoted as "the next level"; ie. 
you're a big man with a big dick if you technical dive, and a total 
weenie if you don't, and as long as people want to take a "technical 
diver course" so they can become "technical divers" the body count 
will continue.

The truly sad thing about this is that there is indeed a need for 
these courses, but they should only be taught when needed rather then 
promoted and advertised as the "next thing in diving". Instead, as 
long as these courses (and the equipment that goes with it) are being 
pushed to divers who probably don't really need them to just enjoy 
diving, the end result will be that the industry as a whole will 
dwindle.

I had a long debate with a recognized leader in the recreational 
scuba industry over a dinner last year. I was trying to justify 
teaching nitrox to recreational divers. He was convincing me that if 
the average dive shop spent the money it takes to setup a nitrox 
station, they can purchase video equipment which they could rent out 
to divers which would give the divers something they could tangibly 
take home with them and show people, which, in the long run, would 
keep those divers coming back for more. 

As more and more time passes, I am beginning to agree with this 
individual. More "prospective divers" should be handed a reef fish 
identification chart rather then a cave reel and manifold. 

Ken


--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]