Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Wed, 10 Dec 1997 07:02:08 -0500
From: "G. Irvine" <gmirvine@sa*.ne*>
Organization: Woodville Karst Plain Project
To: Dick Barker <dickb@es*.co*>
CC: techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: Re: PADI bullshit
Dick, as a proud holder of one of your certifications, I agreee. I also
got my "nitrox" from those characters way back when. Mount correctly
changed his standards when he got better information, a trait missing
from the competition, if you could call it that.


Dick Barker wrote:
> 
> As a PADI Instructor I have to say that I think PADI is not part of
> the deep air problem. I do teach an occasional PADI OW class and I
> do follow the PADI standards. But I also make sure that every student
> is made aware of the real risks of deep air along with the "60 max
> feet when finish this class, 100 foot with more training OR experience,
> and 130 foot maximum for recreational diving." PADI suggests we
> say that 5 ATA of about 20% O2 is a ppO2 of 1.00 and that that
> 100% O2 can be toxic. The real risk for most who step below 130 feet
> is from narcosis. You have to be really stupid to dive air deep
> enough to be at risk from a O2 tox standpoint.
> 
> I also wish I could stuff my snorkel up some warm water CD - but I
> still strap it to my mask while teaching in Seattle, Here, nobody
> ever uses the things to snorkel as the viz is not good enough to
> to see anything while face down in the water, so everyone swims on
> their back when on the surface. (sounds like I am rambling a bit)
> 
> PADI is not perfect but it should not take a hit for deep air. That
> seems to be prety much a TDI exclusive. Tom seems to be backing off
> from deep air with his agency but I rmmember when Hyper Dick did
> my nitrox class, long before the "T" got added to IANTD, a ppO2
> of 1.6 was OK. Tom has that down to 1.4 with 1.6 as a "resting max"
> or something like that. I still think that PADI and all the others
> are wrong when they try to pin deep air limits on O2 tox instead of
> narcosis, Doing dumb thing is what kills most of the them, not the
> O2 tox.
> 
> For my nitrox course (way back when) I chose to dive the Duane at
> the main deck level with nitrox II,or 1.56 ppO2, with no ill effects.
> Today I would not push the ppO2 that high and would also think it
> a bit strange that the instructor didn't do the dive and in fact
> was not even on the boat. On the other hand, he did give me a T
> shirt, a sample chamber ride to 100 feet, and invited me to a
> very wild birthday party of his.
> 
> PADI gets a lot of deserved and undeserved flack.
>  Why would anyone use 1-800-PAY-PADI for a phone number?
>  Put Another Dollar In
>  PAID
>  etc.
> 
> But you think they got troubles - do a web search for OFDA, "one
> of the better bogus agencies". You have to get past at least
> five listings of Oregon Funeral Directors Association to get to
> the first Old Fart Divers Association listing.
> 
> Even OFDA thinks deep air is dumb.
> 
> Disclaimer: Yep, I am OFDA, but that doesn't mean I am FAS.
> 
> --
> Dick Barker dickb@es*.co*  http://www.eskimo.com/~dickb/
> Do you qualify to join OFDA?  http://www.eskimo.com/~dickb/ofda.html
> San Juan Isl Dive Charter?    http://www.eskimo.com/~dickb/starfire.html
> 
> --
> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]