Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Tue, 09 Dec 1997 16:36:51 +0100
To: "Des Paroz" <paroz@oz*.co*.au*>
From: Pedro Neves <a2376@le*.si*.ua*.pt*>
Subject: Re: PADI standards .....
Cc: techdiver@aquanaut.com
At 18:44 09/12/97 +1100, you wrote:


"...PADI's standards are designed to teach no decompression diving to a
maximum of 40m, preferably 30m.  This is the stated aim, and they do this
quite well."


"PADI's attitude as far as I've always experienced (as a diver and
instructor) has been that depths beyond 40m, decompression diving and
penetration beyond the natural light zone (technical diving?) are outside
the scope of what they teach.  They also say that if someone wants to
venture outside these limits, tehy need to gain appropriate training, and
will refer appropriately"

"...And I hope if PADI do embrace deco diving, they maintain a depth
>limit of no more than 50m for nitrox based gases.


I would like you to explain me a few things:

1) How can you give limits for depht (30 to 40m) for dives on air, and
another limit for nitrox based gases (50m)?
Are you saying that when using nitrox you can dive deeper than using air?

2) what nitrox based gases do you use for dives at 50m? According to my
calculation that would give an EANx23 (ppO2=1,38 bar at 50 m), and for that
depht, using the Buehlmann tables there is no possibility for no
decompression dives at 50m. 

3) Does the work envolved on mixing oxygen and air to blend an EANx23
justifies the "safety margin"?


Thanks in advance

Pedro Neves
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]