On Sun, 23 Nov 1997 16:50:04 +1000, you wrote: > 4) In this same interest you will find that when you graduate to real >diving, as in caves, you will not want to accellerate your ppo2 at >lower depths while still being faced with a long decompression at >shallower depths, and making bizarre mixes to do this is a dangerous >mistake (just like the fantasy of holding an accellerated ppo2 on a >rebreather throughout a deco). I am anticipating the thinking that the >80/20 crowd would then go to an additional oxygen in cave without =20 >accounting for total exposure, and subject themselves to the risk of tox >in the final deco steps. Tox you do not get out of - bends you do. Would someone explain' the "fantasy" of holding an accelerated ppo2 on a rebreather throughout a deco ' and why it's a fantasy?Are we talking tox here or what?And how does 80/20 supposedly help divers with poor buoyancy control? Hope I didn't come inb too late on this one. Also, someone mind listing the claimed benefits of 80/2?. Thanks John Dunk o Tallahassee,Fl o screwloose@el*.co* ____o_____ -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]