Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 18:36:19 -0400
From: Ben Greenhouse <b.greenhouse@ut*.ca*>
To: techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: Deep air
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------2EE9A3066D7DE9E308E4FDA4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Here's my TDI instructor's (and friend) take on the deep air course......

Steve Lewis wrote:

> Ben: I did not know of the current debate about deep air, but this is
> something that surfaces regularly
> and seems to attract lots of attention from under all the rocks... Here's
> my take on the reason for some sort of extended range course.
>
> Firstly, an extended range course is not about diving deep on air...
> whatever that is. As you know from experience, up here in the great lakes
> deep on air is anything beyond 130 feet. The cold, lack of vis, and general
> quality of the environment contribute greatly to getting mentally out of
> shape real fast. So naturally, dives to 200 feet on air in northern
> conditions are extraordinarily tough and not called for in the course. I
> can't speak for
> instructors working in Florida conditions, but I do not feel it necessary
> to conduct dives in this range to accomplish what the course is intended
> to.
>
> The extended range course is more about equipment management (more tanks,
> streamlined gear configuration, equipment choices), gas and deco management
> (long exposures with very high decompression debits and large gas volume
> requirements), and physiological task loading (how do candidates manage
> in-water emergencies, how do they react to very long periods of time spent
> at the shallow deco stops, and do they recognize the effects of narcosis
> and how do they react to it), and last and most important, very detailed
> dive planning. Diving deep on anything for a long time is a pain in the ass
> to orchestrate
>
> It is necessary on the course to gain  experience that can carry over to
> trimix. A trimix course is about very simple math and some basic formulae
> all the nitty-gritty in-water and equipment stuff should be handled long
> before throwing someone on a helium mix that'll get them totally screwed if
> they
> start blowing off deco and missing scheduled runtimes.
>
> I think the "deep air" courses kind of grew out of this need... "let's see
> how these folks handle such and such a situation" so to speak. Don't forget
> that
> trimix is a relatively new tool for recreational divers, and is still
> misunderstood by masses of people. Deep air on scuba has been around since
> the forties and it's still a hotly debated point and misunderstood by
> masses of people so why expect anything else. To begin with one has to
> define it and there's no agreement there. British Sub-Aqua Club courses
> teach level II divers to 160 feet as standard... and the waters around the
> UK are never warm or particularly noted for great vis.
>
> Anyhow, finally it's a question of choice. I use light trimix on dives in
> Lake Eire on wrecks as shallow as 170 feet. For short duration dives the
> decompression debit is outweighed in my mind by the benefit of being able
> to conduct working (data gathering) dives with a clear head. However, I
> have conducted solo dives to 200 feet plus on air... but I do so with an
> understanding that my reactions will not be their usual "razor sharp"
> selves.
>
> Ben, hope this answers some of your questions... and yes I do think there's
> room for an intro to trimix course. By the way, feel free to post this on
> the net if you wish. And what the hell are folks refering to? Who killed
> whom?
>
> Steve Lewis
> TDI CI 007
> doppler@ea*.co*
>
> b.greenhouse@ut*.ca* on 10/08/97 02:14:07 PM
>
> To:   Steve Lewis/PGComm
> cc:   greenhar@mu*.CI*.Mc*.CA*
> Subject:  Deep Air
>
> Steve
>
>     Just wanted to get your opinion on this deep air debate (that you
> may or may not know is going on on the internet).  A lot of people are
> badmouthing TDI for insisting on deep air before trimix, saying it is
> just a moneygrab.  Others are saying that deep air is basically only a
> course on air management, decompression theory etc.... What do you
> think?
>
> Ben
>
> begin:          vcard
> fn:             Ben Greenhouse
> n:              Greenhouse;Ben
> org:            University of Toronto
> email;internet: b.greenhouse@ut*.ca*
> x-mozilla-cpt:  ;0
> x-mozilla-html: TRUE
> version:        2.1
> end:            vcard



--------------2EE9A3066D7DE9E308E4FDA4
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="vcard.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Ben Greenhouse
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="vcard.vcf"

begin:          vcard
fn:             Ben Greenhouse
n:              Greenhouse;Ben
org:            University of Toronto
email;internet: b.greenhouse@ut*.ca*
x-mozilla-cpt:  ;0
x-mozilla-html: TRUE
version:        2.1
end:            vcard


--------------2EE9A3066D7DE9E308E4FDA4--

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]