Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 01:40:30 -0400
From: nelson <nhbarger@er*.co*>
To: wwm@sa*.ne*
CC: gmirvine@sa*.ne*, Underwater Outfitters <u_wotfrs@ix*.ne*.co*>,
     techdiver@aquanaut.com, jpost@ke*.ne*
Subject: Re: Bent diver at Whitefish Point
Bill Mee wrote:
> 
> George has hit the nail on the head.  Your actions were completely
> irresponsible.  Under no circumstances should you ever leave divers in
> the water.  The only circumstance in which this would be allowable would
> be if you could get another vessel on the scene to stand by and assist
> the decompressing divers.
> 
> Your contention about the "Auxiliary Coast Guard" is absolute baloney.
> The "Auxialiary Coast Guard" has no statutory authority (although they
> would like you to think they do) and is comprised of volunteers with
> power boats, with nothing else to do, who dress up in Coast Guard
> uniforms.  The Auxiliary Coast Guard are a joke and should perform their
> free boat inspections at the dock where they belong.  Tell the
> examinming officer (a real Coast Guardsman) and judge at the
> administrative hearing about this nonsense and see what the result is.
> 
> When you lose a diver or have divers in distress the responding Coast
> Guard station will always ask you to stand by.  When divers are lost off
> of drift charter boats (a common occurence in south Florida) you get a
> massive "Securite" alert requesting all vessels in the vicinity to stand
> by and render assistance.  By "abandoning" divers in the water you are
> asking for real trouble. When this type of complete stupidity happens
> here in South Florida, which it does with some regularity, the charter
> boat operators who leave their divers get in all kinds of trouble.
> 
> As for your bent diver.  This is fine example of the sort of idiocy
> typical of most sea going socalled "technical" charters. These events
> are characterized (down here at any rate) by a boatload of personal
> preference types, all with different dive plans, deco profiles, gear
> configurations and bearded fat slobbery. These dives are "charlie
> foxtrots" waiting to happen. Offshore technical dives are more dangerous
> and complex ( in most circumstances) then extended range deep mixed gas
> cave dives. Under these circumstances it is even more critical for
> everyone to be on the same gear and deco plan so that everybody is out
> of the water at the same time and you don't have the sort of stupidity
> which has started this thread.  If all of your guys were topsides then
> it would have been a simple matter to take the bent diver in to shore
> instead of having to leave people in the water.  Our experience is that
> those doing all of the extra deco are probably doing the wrong profile
> anyway and should be willing to blow off some of their precious little
> deco in an emergency.
> 
> We have witnessed this "not willing to blow off deco" syndrome on
> numerous occassions.  Most of the "leave dead buddy" in the cave
> situations involved people who were afraid that if they brought the dead
> buddy (generally the dead buddy isn't really dead yet) to the surface
> they are worried about getting bent. This is total bs.
> 
> You should listen to George on this and learn a valuable lesson.  Do it
> Right next time.
> 
> Bill Mee
> G. Irvine wrote:
> >
> > This is bullshit - you got "ordered" based on your bullshit information
> > and your charlie foxtrot in progress. The fact is that you and the rest
> > were suprised by all of this, and acted accordingly - try learning
> > something, like how to plan for cointigencies, instead of blaming
> > everybody when you clearly look like  moron in this case. The kind of
> > judgement you showed just plain sucks pal, and you need to wake up and
> > do something about it, before you end up kiling somebody with stupidity.
> >
> >  What is the deal, is there some secret labotomy that is required to run
> > a dive boat, or is that just to be in the dive business? I never wnat to
> > hear a charlie foxtrot like this again with the blaming and the escuses
> > and this kind of outrageous irrepsonsible stupidity. Go look in the
> > mirror and get honest with yourself , and think this stuff through in
> > the future.
> >
> > Underwater Outfitters wrote:
> > >
> > > George,
> > >
> > > Before you going making your claims as to who is a stroke maybe you
> > > should know some facts, as I know you were not diving with us that
> > > day.
> > >
> > > I was operating the vessel in question and I will not, nor have I ever
> > > left a diver in the water and I would not have left the diver (ONE)
> > > that was decompressing except that I was ORDERED by the U.S.C.G.
> > > Auxillary to leave, as I was less than three miles from shore and
> > > another boat was responding to pick up the diver (ONE) who had 22
> > > minutes of deco.left.
> > >
> > > The diver who was bent was in no shape to get himself back in the
> > > water and he was out of his gear before we knew that he had a problem.
> > > We first tried to administer oxygen with his oxygen regulator but he
> > > could not hold it in his mouth. How the hell was he supposed to go
> > > back in the water when he could not hold a regulator? The time that it
> > > would have taken to get him back in the water would have been longer
> > > than the last diver had to decompress.
> > >
> > > After being TOLD TO LEAVE, we had the diver to shore in under 10
> > > minutes were there was medical personnel waiting. Is not prompt
> > > medical treatment for anybody who is injured proper prodical??
> > > Obviously, my boat is not the same slow tug that you dive from as I
> > > went back out and picked up my diver, beating the responding boat that
> > > was supposed to pick him up. (Not your fault guys, you did your best
> > > and I thank you).
> > >
> > > The stroke in this story is Darryl Ertel who cut me off coming into
> > > the harbor, unloaded his boat and sat at the dock instead of
> > > responding to the Coast Guard request for the closest vessel (which he
> > > was) to assist and pick up the diver that we were told to leave.
> > >
> > > For your information, the USCG, several charter operators and divers
> > > (even the one left in the water) who WITNESSED the event praised us
> > > for our immediate response and our professionalism in handling the
> > > emergency situation.
> > >
> > > Captain Mike McKay
> > >
> > > At 11:38 AM 9/8/97 -0400, you wrote:
> > > >Jeff, we are hearing that the dive operator left people in the water
> > > >and ran the bent guy in, rather than sticking him back in the water
> > > >until the rest of the divers were up.
> > > >
> > > > Sounds like you guys have misused the workd "stroke" - the stroke in
> > >
> > > >this situation is clear. Let me use the word in a sentence: " Only a
> > > >STROKE would leave a diver in the water. Rule Number One applies to
> > > dive
> > > >boat operators, as well as divers.
> > > >
> > > > When you guys are discussing a charlie foxtrot, which appears to be
> > > >the dominate topic of conversation up there, try to remember that
> > > being
> > > >bus-driving stupid is not considered an attibute to most people.
> > > >
> > > > You strokes need to think your plans all the way out before you rush
> > >
> > > >out to risk people's lives, and you need to leard to understand this
> > > >stuff before you run aorund like headless chikens .
> > > >--
> > > >Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to
> > > `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> > > >Send list subscription requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
> > > >
> > > >
> > --
> > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> > Send list subscription requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
> --
> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> Send list subscription requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Well...have you done much ocean diving lately?  Not everybody can enter
the water at the same time = varied out of water times.  Based on air
consumption bottom times and total times vary = varied out of water
times.  Some people do shorter dives because they get cold at temps of
high 40's or low 50's = varied out of water times.  Longer decompression
does not equal a wrong profile.  I would rather be left in the water to
finish decompression with adequate forewarning and surface support and
give an injured diver a better chance at recovery vice placing myself at
risk or placing another at greater risk.
There may be situations where leaving a diver is a less than optimal
choice or not a viable option at all but this was not one of them.
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send list subscription requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]