Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: Paul Harris <pharris@cr*.pl*.uk*>
To: "'Techdiver'" <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: Manifolds
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 10:41:43 +0100
Further to Paul Chapmans' earlier message re: manifolds and the limited =
options over here in the UK.
What are the relative merits of the OMS manifold?
It appears to have facing o-rings but the blurb says that they are =
captive like a DIN fitting and therefore a 'superior method in =
preventing O-ring extrusion'
It certainly seems a bit more solid than the Apeks ( even the 300 bar =
version), which has single barrel o-rings and has a lot less joins than =
the MDE.
The manifold is held to the valves by nuts around the outside of the =
shaft so if the shaft is knocked and twisted, it should not unscrew.
I have looked through the 'techdiver' archives and found a couple of =
postings - the burst disk issue doesn't apply to us Brits and the =
advantages of the OMS o-ring system was explained 'By The Owner' as the =
subject field explains and so says much the same as the glossy.

Is the double barrel o-ring option that effective that it is worth =
pursuing to the point of importing a manifold/valve system plus possibly =
having to obtain US threaded cylinders. (UK ones tend to be M25x2)
=20
Paul

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send list subscription requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]