Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: <bdi@wh*.ne*>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 12:19:58 +1100
To: <EliteDive@ao*.co*>
Subject: Re: Pin head- read and learn- then shut up
Cc: techdiver@aquanaut.com, cavers@ge*.co*, TOM.MOUNT@wo*.at*.ne*
At 12:08 AM 8/03/1997 -0500, Satterfield (EliteDive@ao*.co*)
wrote:

>You misinformed clown there is not a single page of 
>Morralls work left in that text I rewrote the entire 
>thing,

Then tell me why ALL of pages 1, 2 and 3 (Oxygen Theory
For Advanced Divers) of your 'Complete Technical
Programme' are copied from pages 16, 18 and 19 of the
Technical Instructors Manual WHICH WAS WRITTEN BEFORE
YOU EVEN JOINED ANDI - you know, while you were still working
nights over the photocopier at IANTD.

Similarly page 8 of 'your' text is taken straight from page
23 of the Instructors Manual, except for the fact that you
had the effrontery to removed the line attributing the chart
to Mark Caney.

'Your' page 9 is a copy of half of page 25 in the Insructors
Manual while 'your' pages 10 and 11 are straight copies of 
pages 24, 26, and the other half of 25 of the Instructors
Manual.

Turning the page we discover 'your' page 14 bears a
remarkable degree of similarity to page 27 of the Instructors
Manual while 'your' page 15 is a dead ringer for their
page 29.

'Your' page 17 is the chart off their page 31 and 'your' page
18 is the explanation of the Residual Toxicity Percentage
Rule from their pages 32 and 33.

Your page 19 is identical to the rest of their page 33
except, in the RTP calculation example you have inserted
different depths and nitrox mixes.

Remember Tony you said:

>I left very little of what was there before. The only 
>other work in it at all is maybe 10 or so pages in the 
>decompression section and some in narcsois that Ed wrote
>it is not bad but I did not have to leave it in there,...

Well, in the first 20 pages, there's only 3 or 4 that
MIGHT be your original work. And we haven't even got to 
the decompression section yet. 

Your amnesia regarding the origin of the printed word is 
equalled by your misinterpretation of the spoken word. 
You wrote:

>When I presented my program to these guy's with a complete 
>set of S & P's and text to replace the horrendous stuff they 
>had done, the main comment was this is to hard...

No, their main comment was "make sure that its not too hard 
(too big a leap) compared to the CSU course."

You wrote 

>Now you have some facts instead of you misinfromed and 
>willfull disregard of such. You will find my friend that 
>I can back up every single staement I make. Feel free 
>to check all of this out.
>
>Next time you think about jumping up way out of your 
>level, at least try to have some facts, or in the 
>alternative just listen.

Yes Tony. One last thing. You wrote

>Nichols not much better, he thinkd you dive with an isolator
> valve closed and you can't turn you valves on and off.

There's that memory drop-out again Tony. Very convenient.The 
sentence is " Isolation manifolds should be used with both 
systems isolated if the diver finds himself in a position where 
he is unable to isolate the system."

Tony. Integrity. Self-control. Try them.


rgrds      billyw



--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send list subscription requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]