Run for your fucking lives, political correctness is doing a frontal 
assault on TechDiver. And he/she/it is bringing the feds.

Say, baybeee, ARE you really cute? What are your measurements? Are your 
jugs real, any implants or other fake stuff? Pic on the Web, anywhere, 
toots? Horney divers want to know!

So, what are you going to do? Sic the IRS after me? You fucking liberal 
assholes are all the same.

>I have only known you for a short period of time,  but because your
>reputation precedes you, I take the liberty of bringing this item to your
>attention in the hope you are able to render some assistance.  
>
>Under separate e-mail, I have transmitted three messages that evidence my
>contention.
>These are postings from WKPP.  I am sure you are aware of the denigrating,
>insulting language being used in the techdiver newsgroup; it is something
>expected in most similar forums (although its abundance here is staggeirng!).
>
>Is NOAA in any way connected to WKPP ? If not, what government agencies are ?
>It is my understanding when the Director issues a statement and signs
>"Director XYZ",
>he or she is stating OFFICIAL POLICY of such a group or project and
>represents, not only the entire group of workers, but also reflects on
>associates; be it government agencies or private enterprises that support,
>permit, endorses or in any way are related to such group or project.
>  
>I would like to know what government agencies endorse, support, and/or
>condone the barrage of insults and vulgar profanity the director of WKPP
>issues on a DAILY basis. Also, is the use of any public funds involved;
>whether directly on equipment or indirectly in in-kind services or otherwise.
>What agency head or manager tolerates being associated  with this ?  Is this
>project on public lands ? Is the underground considered public land ?
>
>I would like to know who can be approached to resolve this situation. Many
>persons in search for bring legitimate questions related to the WKPP
>activity, only to be verbally abused (some answer back making the issue a
>tennis match of insults!). I am not going to expand on the futility of these
>arguments, nor the dissappointment for whoever asked the question, nor their
>lack of desire to ever ask again!
>
>I want to address exclusively the issue of someone speaking or writing on
>behalf of a project in ANYWAY connected to OUR government. Let the private
>supporters respond as they deem appropiate with the issue.  If you are not in
>a position to provide assistance in search for these answers, could you
>please point in the direction of persons,  offices or agencies involved where
>I could find responses ?
>
>Thank you for your attention.
>QTV

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]