Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
At 05:01 PM 1/13/97 -0500, you wrote: >To start with you shouldn't penetrate without knowing the >outside of a wreck, that way once out even if not the hole >you crawled into, you can find the anchor line. Then you >penetrate only as far as you can see out and keep track of >things like bulkheads or doorways or anything that you can >recognize as the way out. Then as you learn the area you >want to penetrate you can go progessively deeper into >the wreck, learning each new area before moving on. > >That is only one way, but it works for me. > Mark, but then you are not truely penetrating a wreck. You may be going around on the cat walks, but you are not getting good penetration. You want to do some real wreck diving, come on down here. I am sure that a few of use would love to show you that your system DOSN'T WORK!!!!! >Mark > >billy@bd*.co*.au* wrote: >> >> At 09:00 PM 10/01/1997, Mark Welzel wrote: >> >> >I think that progressive penetration is the only way to >> >safely explore a wreck.... >> >> > This way no matter what happens to your >> >line, you can find your way out of the wreck and back >> >to the anchor line... >> Reread what you posted, and stop and reread it again. But then again, you will still not get the point of the stupid comments that you are making. Anyone got a Bullseye handy???? Mr Lungs aka Jeoff Freed, CRTT Orange City, Fl PADI Divemaster www.totcon.com/users/lungs A Good day at work beats a bad day with Mark!!
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]