> Scuba has evolved to become quite easy to learn and practice. The dive > equipment for scuba is extremely reliable, and durable. Most of it works > no matter how badly it is treated. The same is not true for our > rebreathers, as you know. I think Mike's point was (correct me if I'm wrong, Mike) that if you give rebreathers another 50 years, like SCUBA has had to get to the level it is today, then it might follow the same popularity path. On the other hand, you're point is a good one, that rebreathers will probably always require a higher level to conceptual understanding to operate. But is that a bad thing? The way I see it, today's average SCUBA diver is WAY underqualified to be a SCUBA diver. I applauded IANTD's intorductory nitrox course (taking non-divers and training them straight through to nitrox) because it's a course that teaches divers the things that *ALL* divers should have been taught in the first place. Aloha, Rich
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]