Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Tue, 1 Oct 1996 10:41:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: Roderick Farb <rfarb@em*.un*.ed*>
To: Richard Pyle <deepreef@bi*.bi*.ha*.or*>
cc: Sam032093@ao*.co*, TechDiver <techdiver@terra.net>
Subject: Re: Figure deco on the fly was Re: Fwd: Real Life Scare
It was not a military guy that reported the list of pO2's and effects. It
was one of the non-diving scientists. Rod

On Mon, 30 Sep 1996, Richard Pyle wrote:

> 
> 
> Hi Bill,
> 
> I hope you don't mind that I cc'd this to techdiver.
> 
> > In a message dated 96-09-30 14:21:25 EDT, you write:
> > 
> > <<  After hearing what soem of the USN 
> >  guys had to say at this forum I just returned from, it sounds like that 
> >  is a good idea. >>
> > Would it be worth elaborating on this for us guppies that missed the forum?
> > Probably would from my perspective,curiosity, interest, etc.  :)
> 
> Not much of detail.  One of the guys from the USN showed a table with 
> essentially the following:
> 
> PO2     Real-world experience
> ---     ---------------------
> 1.7     Number of serious operational incidents.
> 1.6     Several serious incidents with "mitigating circumstances"
>           (e.g. High breathing resistance, etc.)
> 1.5     No known incidents (Someone else later reported at least 
>           one incident)
> 1.4     No effects with extreme exposure (2 examples of divers who were 
>           inadvertently exposed to 55 hours at 1.4 over three days, with
>           pulmonary problems but no CNS problems).
> 1.3     Upper USN limit for routine mixed gas operations - but 10 cases
>           of "disturbed consciousness".
> 
> 
> Like they say - if it's good enough for government....   Seriously, 
> though, this forum really nailed home for me the fact that the guys with 
> the REAL experience are the various military agencies, and they are the 
> ones we should listen to.  They used to do a setpoint of 0.7, which I 
> would never follow because it would lead to unreasonable deco and doesn't 
> leave enough of a margin of error for hypoxia.  1.3 doesn't affect the 
> deco all that much, and provides some extra headroom for hyperoxia.  I'll 
> run some profiles to see how it affects deco, but I'm now thinking that I 
> will run 1.3 for the bottom, and 1.4 for the deco.
> 
> Rich
> --
> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@terra.net'.
> Send subscription/archive requests to `techdiver-request@terra.net'.
> 

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]