Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Thu, 5 Sep 1996 16:07:53 -0400 (EDT)
From: John Todd <afn48281@af*.or*>
To: Richard Pyle <deepreef@bi*.bi*.Ha*.Or*>
cc: Anthony Montgomery <amontgom@ha*.ed*>, techdiver@terra.net,
     cavers@ge*.co*
Subject: Re: Q.T. on the U.T. Rebreather - Fraud by any other name

   pyle - the solenoid sticks open due to computer malfunction.explain to me
how you even know its stuck open before its too late.

On Thu, 5 Sep 1996, Richard Pyle wrote:

> 
> >     anthony,youre a smart man.
> 
> Yes, he is. Very.
> 
> > figure this out.solenoid failes on a closed
> > circuit,pumps a bunch of pure o2 into the mix,what happens?
> 
> The user shuts the solenoid supply cutoff valve.  If that took some time, 
> the user switches to OC temporarily before the high PO2 makes its way 
> around the breathing loop. The user flushes the loop with diluent, goes 
> back to CC, and manually maintains O2 setpoint for the remainder of the dive.
> 
> > at least in the
> > semi closed youre breathing a known gas mix before hand.
> 
> Stop! Stop! You're killing me! Wait - let me catch my breath.  Sorry, but 
> the concepts of "breathing a known gas mix" and "semi closed rebreather" 
> in the same sentence struck me as extremely funny.
> 
> > now,back to closed
> > circuit,computer failes,whoops,we have no o2 readout.
> 
> Any closed circuit rebreather that relies only on the computer to provide 
> a PO2 readout has some serious design flaws.  Fortunately, I know of no 
> such closed circuit design that is or will soon be available commercially.
> 
> Incidently, folks - my intention is not to be a "semi-closed basher".  I 
> really do think they have a place in diving, and depending on the 
> particular unit, they can be damn useful in some situations.  I'm just 
> trying to stamp out buffoonery here.
> 
> Aloja,
> Rich
> 
> 
> > - jt
> > 
> > On Wed, 4 Sep 1996, Anthony Montgomery wrote:
> > 
> > > On Wed, 4 Sep 1996, John Todd wrote:
> > > 
> > > >     rich,no one who takes one of those 4 day iantd/tdi/whatever agency
> > > > courses on "rebreather diving" will be trained right to deal with
manually
> > > > controlling the functions of the rebreather that are normally
controlled by
> > > > the computer.you of all people should realize that.on top of that,if the
> > > > computer cant be trusted then how can you expect to trust the electronic
> > > > output generated by the computer?at least with the mechanical
rebreathers
> > > > (err, semi-closed) theres no fancy gadgetry or tomfoolery to mess
with,and
> > > > as a result its safer. - jt
> > > > 
> > > John,
> > > 
> > > 	Do you really think semi-closed rebreathers are safer?  It seems
> > > to me that diving on a unit which depends on expected workload and 
> > > theoretical O2 consumption rate isn't safe.  But actually I won't go as
> > > far to say that semi-closed systems are unsafe. I would consider these
> > > aspects of semi-closed systems a disadvantage just as I would consider
> > > the likelyhood of electronic failure a disadvantage for fully-closed
> > > systems.
> > > 
> > > 		ANTHONY MONTGOMERY
> > > Marine Option Program		Waikiki Aquarium
> > > 1000 Pope Road  MSB #203	2777 Kalakaua Ave
> > > Honolulu, Hawaii  96822		Honolulu, Hawaii   96815
> > > Fax: (808) 956-2417		Fax: (808) 923-1771
> > > Phone:  (808) 956-6000		Phone: (808) 923-9741
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> Richard Pyle
> deepreef@bi*.bi*.ha*.or*
> *******************************************************************
> "WHATEVER happens to you when you willingly go underwater is
> COMPLETELY and ENTIRELY your own responsibility! If you cannot
> accept this responsibility, stay out of the water!"
> *******************************************************************
> 
> 

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]