Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: <gmii@in*.co*>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 1996 14:56:47 -0700
Subject: Re: Q.T. on the U.T. Rebreather - Fraud by any other name
To: trimix <trimix@ri*.sa*.ne*>, techdiver@terra.net
Cc: cavers@ge*.co*

   In reading this account of another electronic rebreather nightmare I am 
amazed at the sheer stupidity and arrogance of the "tech" "engineers"  who come 
up with this crap. Clearly anything in the breathing loop of any rebreather is 
by definition at the same number of atmospheres as the diver - obviously
whoever 
designed this is one dumb fuck.

   For you dumb fucks out there, that means that the chips are compressed, the 
batteries are compressed, and the besides the obvious chance to short circuit
as 
they are squeezed, some components, like dry cell nicads, can not tollerate 
compression. It is no wonder , however, that the same crowd that went for
square 
lights fell for this bogocity.

    Most computer chips are hermeticly sealed, which means that they may retain 
compression in their voids and explode when the pressure is lowered. I do not 
know much about rebreathers or computers, but I think NOVRAM chips have their 
own batteries, so that means the chip and the battery are being compromised. 

    Trying to encase this crap in gell would not alleveiate any of these 
problems, and would add the problem of water wicking down the wires and causing 
the endless electonic mystery. 

  Just like most dive equipment, these devices are clearly created by people
who 
do not actually dive for people who need a magic carpet, and the only
commercial 
use for a piece of shit like what is described here is for instructors to teach 
wannabees and strokes yet one more merrit badge specialty.

    But, what else is new? - G


  


Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]