Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Wed, 17 Jul 1996 18:26:16 -0400
From: Anthony DeBoer <adb@he*.re*.or*>
To: techdiver@terra.net
Subject: Re: the quarter-turn myth
Organization: Linda's Dragon Memorial Society
Marc Dufour <emdx@ac*.ne*> wrote:
>What the hell is SO DIFFICULT with making a SIMPLE 1/4 turn valve???
>Gee, railroads have been using them on air brake couplings for the
>last century! And they're intuitive (not to mention touch-feelable):
>in line with the pipe, it's OPEN, perpendicular to the pipe, it's
>CLOSED. Why bother with zillion-turn valves that have to be either
>OPENED or CLOSED???? 

Heat of pressurization.

According to an IANTD textbook, "rapid pressurization to 2000 psi will
generate a gas temperature approaching 1600 degrees F".  If you're doing
this with pure oxygen, the next thing that happens is often an oxygen
fire and explosion, and this is why quarter-turn ball valves are banned
from such applications.

With lesser percentages of oxygen, you might be off the hook for such
dire consequences, but the smashing you'd be giving to the HP seat in
your regulator and to other components might not help them last terribly
long.  One regulator technician tells me that letting pressure build up
relatively slowly in a regulator rather than quickly cranking the valve
open reduces wear quite a bit.  

For high-pressure applications, slow-opening valves are recommended.


-- 
Anthony DeBoer                                  http://www.onramp.ca/~adb/
adb@he*.re*.or* (here)
adb@ge*.co* (work)                             #include "std.disclaimer"

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]