Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "David Norton (Excell Data)" <a-davnor@MI*.co*>
To: "'cavers@ge*.co*'" <cavers@ge*.co*>,
     "'techdiver@terra.net'"
     ,
     "'sbrillhart@ne*.hs*.ed*'"
     ,
     "'kens@uf*.ed*'"
    
Subject: RE: OMS manifold
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 1996 11:26:08 -0700
I've not seen the detachable hand wheel, so I am not using it.  Sounds
kinda dumb to me too.  

>----------
>From: 	Ken Sallot[SMTP:KEN@co*.ci*.uf*.ed*]
>Sent: 	Tuesday, April 23, 1996 5:41 AM
>To: 	David Norton (Excell Data); 'cavers@ge*.co*';
>'techdiver@terra.net'; 'sbrillhart@ne*.hs*.ed*'
>Subject: 	RE: OMS manifold
>
>> From:           "David Norton (Excell Data)" <a-davnor@MI*.co*>
>
>> I currently use the OMS Manifold.  It's fine -- No problems with it so
>> far.  Knobs are large and easily turnable when I have my cold water
>> mitts on.  Some of the fill adapters are not usable with it because of
>> the protruding stem.  Just carry with you the plugs that convert it to
>> yoke and you'll be fine.
>> 
>> Hope this helps.
>
>David,
>
>Are you using the same OMS manifold with the detachable handwheel? 
>You know, the one with the 3' long cable running from the manifold 
>down to a little bulb on the left hand side? 
>
>I have to wonder about any company that manufacturers such horse 
>crap, let alone markets it.
>
>"To prevent roll offs". Roll offs are easy to prevent. QUIT HITTING 
>THE CEILING.
>
>Ken
>

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]