Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Subject: Re: DAN Article
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 96 15:57:00 -0000
From: Robert Wolov <wolov@hi*.co*>
To: "joan coval" <saphire@ix*.ne*.co*>
cc: <techdiver@terra.net>
>What issue of the US Navy Diving manual are you reading from?  I have what I 
>believe to be the current issue which is:
>
>U.S. Navy Diving Manual, Volume 1 (Air Diving), REV 3, 15 FEB 1993.

Nope! Rev 2 (that'll learn me) Keep in mind that AFIP is a pathology ref 
lab, I was happy to get *any* copy of the NDM. But no excuses...your info 
is more up to date!


>The reason that I am bringing this to your attention is that the 
>information you wrote regarding the ppO2 (low pressure) of 0.6 ata has been 
superseded by 
>more current information on pulminary or 'whole body' oxygen toxicity in 
volume 
>1, revision 3 of the NDM.

All the more reason to pay a visit to the GPO to get my own personal 
(latest) copy!

>
>O2 toxicity is BOTH pressure and time dependent and the general consensus 
>among a considerable number of experienced divers is to keep it at or below 
1.4 
>ata ata @ a maximum bottom time of 50 minutes (US Navy); 1.3 ata is even 
'more 
>bettah' to provide a wider zone to avoid a CNS hit.

At least that hasn't changed. ;-)
 
>
>According to the U.S. Navy you can do 1.3 ata ppO2 indefinetly -- well, 
>with in 
>reason of course because this is somewhat also affected by the type of 
>delivery 
>system too.

Did I misinterpret this? Even in Rev 2 I thought that only up to 0.6 atm 
was "indefinite" duration. The 0.6 to 1.6 atm levels gave lung damage (I 
assume alveolar damage from oxygen free radicals)

>The Navy went to this 1.3 ata value apparently because hyperoxic gas 
>mixtures tend to increase  arterial CO2 levels, which, when coupled with 
higher than 
>normal (sea level) partial pressures of oxygen over a defined (finite) 
>period of time, exacerbates the onset of CNS O2 toxicity. Whamo!

That was the conclusion I came to from the less detailed statements of 
Rev 2. Seems like Nature's joke on divers.

>
>This doesn't mean that they don't dive higher ppO2s and longer exposure 
>durations but it does mean that they get to convince the Chief of Naval 
Operations and 
>others for approval to do it. And let me tell you, getting your mothers 
permission is a 
>whole lot easier .......

Hey, It's an old Navy tradition..."It's easier to ask forgiveness than 
permission!"

Thanks though for the more up to date data! My apologies to the List for 
any confusion I might have caused.

Robb Wolov

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]