Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 01:40:37 -0500 (EST)
From: "Paul W. Smith" <afn20573@af*.or*>
To: Rich Stinchcomb <STINCH%11510@x4*.et*.co*>
cc: techdiver@terra.net
Subject: Re: Gear rigging video and independent tanks
Rich, with the regs I use, the high pressure hoses naturally run to the 
left side, so they both go quite nicely down the side with very little bend.
One guage is smooth and one has "fins" to avoid confusion.

If you are using the Sherwood "slant back" valves, it is possible to run
the hoses down toward the tank without too much bending. This would allow
for running a HP hose down either side. Nothing wrong with that, might help
you to avoid the possibility of confusion.

There are good principles and dangerous principles, but there is no "one
right way" that covers all situations and all people. The important thing
is to mentally go through all the "what if" possibilities before committing
a rig to the water and to use something that will feel natural and
comfortable for you. And then practice, practice..Good Divin, Paul Smith

On Thu, 25 Jan 1996, Rich Stinchcomb wrote:
> Two low pressure hoses are shown to go down from the first stages and then
bend 
> across the shoulders.  This bend in the low pressure hoses is not a problem.  
> Independent tanks require the use of a SPG on each tank.  I don't believe 
> bending the high pressure hose across the back so the two SPG's can be
mounted 
> together is a good idea.  Another thought I had was to run the high pressure 
> hose from each post down and clip the SPG to the right and left side D-rings
at 
> the waist level.  I have never seen this done, but seems like a solution that 
> results in less stress to the high pressure hose.  What are the disadvantages 
> to having a SPG for the left tank mounted on the left D-ring and a SPG from
the 
> right tank mounted on the right D-ring?
> 
> I'm not interested in the manifold vs. independent tank discussion.  This 
> thread would not be required in a manifold solution.  Please send flames to 
> bit@bu*.co* and constructive comments to the list or me.
> 
> ************************************************
> Richard W. Stinchcomb
> Systems Manager
> EATON Corporation
> Pressure Sensors Division
> Bethel, Connecticut  USA
> 
> (VW)   203.798.3123  (FW) 203.798.3214
> (VW) ADNET 561.3123  (VH) 203.723.4553
> 
> E-mail     stinch%11510@x4*.et*.co*
> ************************************************
> 
> 
> --
> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@terra.net'.
> Send subscription/archive requests to `techdiver-request@terra.net'.
> 

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]