Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 04:20:39 -0800
From: fdc02@ix*.ne*.co* (Doug Chapman )
Subject: Argon
To: lagather@mt*.ed*
Cc: techdiver@terra.net
Brendan,

Argon has been used mostly experimentally (and may be still?) as a 
diluent during decompression. However it is highly soluble and is very 
narcotic compared to nitrogen and helium. The premise for considering 
argon was due to its slower diffusion rate into tissue compared to 
nitrogen and helium. One current decompression model (Buhlmann) 
suggests the diffusion of an inert gas into tissue is inversely related 
to the square root of the molecular weight of the gas. For example if 
you compare this ratio for helium with the ratio for nitrogen you would 
find the helium ratio is 2.65 times the nitrogen ratio. Similarly if 
you compare nitrogen to argon, you would find the nitrogen ratio is 
about 1.19 times the argon ratio. What does this mean?

For example, if you look at the 4th compartment (tissue group)of the 
Buhlmann ZH-L12, 12 compartment decompression model you will find the 
"half-time" for helium to be 7 minutes and the half-time for nitrogen 
to be 18.5 minutes. The helium time is 2.65 times faster than the 
nitrogen time. Amazing! You could extrapolate this information and 
conclude the half-time for argon for this compartment would be 22 
minutes. According to the Buhlmann model the increase in the 
compartment gas tension (pressure) is a function of the ambient 
pressure,the time of exposure, and the half-time for the gas being 
considered. Thus for an equal time of exposure and ambient pressure the 
gas with the highest half-time would on-gas slower, and off-gas slower. 
This of course only considers the exponential-exponential hypothesis 
(exponential on-gas and exponential off-gas).

Buhlmann simplified his theory by suggesting the total inert gas 
pressure, the sum of the inert gas partial pressures in the tissue, 
determines the tolerated ambient pressure during decompression.  This 
sum of the inert gas pressures is subtracted and multipled respectively 
by Buhlmann's "a & b" coefficients to derive the tolerated ambient 
pressure (similar to "M" values in the Haldane based models). The 
tolerated ambient pressure is the decompression ceiling; if you ascend 
above the ceiling, decompression sickness may ensue. Stopping at the 
ceiling (decompression stop) will allow more gas to off-gas and the 
ceiling (tolerated ambient pressure) will move shallower until you can 
exit the water.

Since argon diffuses into tissue slower, the replacement of 
nitrogen/helium with argon during decompression would create a 
situation where the argon is on-gasing slower than the nitrogen and/or 
helium is off-gasing. This mechanism is referred to as 
counter-diffusion. This can occur to the degree where the total inert 
gas pressure in the tissue is less than the surrounding ambient 
pressure (fraction of inert gas in breathing mixture times the ambient 
pressure). This process works to shorten the decompression time. The 
same situation exists during gas switching from high helium content 
bottom mixes to air. Your decompression obligation can be significantly 
reduced by switching to air as deep as safely practical because the 
helium (2.65 times faster than nitrogen) is off-gasing rapidly while 
nitrogen is on-gasing more slowly.

Digressing a bit, its should be noted the reverse process
of switching from a heavier inert gas to a lighter inert gas (e.g. 
nitrogen to helium)can create a "super-saturated" condition, where the 
tissue inert gas pressure is greater than the ambient inert gas 
pressure, even with no change in depth from the switch! This is the 
basis of lengthy and often misguided duscussions on isobaric inert gas 
counterdiffusion.

To cut to the chase, using argon may shorten your decompression 
somewhat; however the amount of reduction may not be considered 
significant due to the relatively small difference in diffusion 
half-times between argon and nitrogen. Other considerations such as its 
high solubilities in fats and aqueous fluids may imply additional 
concerns which have not been brought to light, with risks that
may not be warranted considering the degree of benefit.

Doug Chapman

P.S. The above is of course my interpretation and opinion and does not 
imply anything proven or not. (This is a disclaimer!)
 

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]