Resent-From: Michael Chalup <chalup@pr*.ig*.co*> (Much text deleted) > > Also yesterday there was a posting that did clarify the case, it was stated > that the benefit of a Ti lined suit was in he thermal retention properties > of Ti and not it's ability to reflect heat, this would mean that the suit > would be initially warmer but would eventually (I wonder how long ?) revert > to normal neoprene insulation. How about persuing this line ? > Maybe just a bit of thermodynamics is in order. It is my understanding (please correct me if I'm wrong), that at least for a submerged diver the heat loss due to conduction >> than any due to radiation. Radiative heat loss (or the Ti's supposed ability to reflect heat, limiting this factor) is probably overwhelmed by conductive losses. The way to limit heat loss in a wet suit is to: 1. Limit the amount of water flushing through the suit 2. Improve the insulation of the suit, limiting the conductive losses through the neoprene Plush linings supposedly limit water flushing. Is a Ti lining better than a 'normal' nylon lining at this task? Does a Ti lining add some very effective insulating layer between the diver and the ocean? My .02, Mike Chalup Internet: chalup@pr*.ig*.co* 'Taking finely adjusted optics and high voltage electronics and throwing it into a highly conductive corrosive media is plain crazy' - U/W Photography
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]