Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: David
To: Hallsworth <DAVIDH@bv*.mh*.co*.co*>
Subject: re:MASH was load of old tat
From: Michael Chalup <chalup@pr*.ig*.co*>
Cc: chalup@pr*.ig*.co*
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 94 3:18:37 PDT
Resent-From: Michael Chalup <chalup@pr*.ig*.co*>

(Much text deleted)
> 
> Also yesterday there was a posting that did clarify the case, it was stated
> that the benefit of a Ti lined suit was in he thermal retention properties
> of Ti and not it's ability to reflect heat, this would mean that the suit
> would be initially warmer but would eventually (I wonder how long ?) revert
> to normal neoprene insulation. How about persuing this line ?
> 

Maybe just a bit of thermodynamics is in order.  It is my
understanding (please correct me if I'm wrong), that at least for a
submerged diver the heat loss due to conduction >> than any due to
radiation.  Radiative heat loss (or the Ti's supposed ability to
reflect heat, limiting this factor) is probably overwhelmed by
conductive losses.  The way to limit heat loss in a wet suit is to:

		1.  Limit the amount of water flushing through the
		suit

		2.  Improve the insulation of the suit, limiting the 
		conductive losses through the neoprene

Plush linings supposedly limit water flushing.  Is a Ti lining better
than a 'normal' nylon lining at this task?  Does a Ti lining add some
very effective insulating layer between the diver and the ocean?

				My .02,

				Mike Chalup
				Internet:  chalup@pr*.ig*.co*


'Taking finely adjusted optics and high voltage electronics and throwing
it into a highly conductive corrosive media is plain crazy' - U/W Photography 

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]