Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Sun, 19 Nov 1995 09:48:29 -0500
To: techdiver@terra.net
From: billj@ne*.co* (Bill Wesemann)
Subject: Re: Solo vs Buddy
>There is just no way i am buying any of this solo diving stuff, i know that
>this has been covered too many times and alot of you don't want to hear it,
>and i don't have the time to follow and responses (rich and i have spent 
>hours talking about it already in person, it could take weeks here) :-)
>
>my comment is that it's ridiculous to think or say that it's better to be
>in the water without a buddy.  yes the buddy can be a liability... but only
>if he or she isn't trained well enough to <<be>> a buddy... and alot of 
>people (imhe) don't want to take the time or efforts to reach this level of 
>proficency...  if you can't deal with being in the water with a buddy and
>all the concerns that go along with this system then you are not ready for
>diving this environment.  period.
>
>it's almost as bad as not having a tender/captain  on the boat... you guys
>are gonna get into trouble, you're gonna get bent or killed.
>for what!!!
>
>dennis pierce
>

I missed preceding arguments about solo vs buddy diving as I just recently
subscribed to this listsever.
I also believe there are some things that merit discourse and rethinking.
I am not advocating that solo diving is better than buddy diving.  I'm not
going to go through ALL the pro and con arguments either.  However, I do
believe there is a place for solo diving, and that there should not be an
across-the-board taboo against it.  Obviously solo diving is not for
everyone but too many people put way too much dependence on the buddy
system, I did it myself when I first started diving.  Even with the buddy
system you should be prepared to respond to emergencies yourself,
particularly the ones where there is very little time for a response.    
Unfortunately I change jobs quite often, therefore I usually end up in parts
of the country I haven't been before.  This means I am generally in a
position where I do not know anyone in that specific area.  My choices here
are to dive or not to dive, and I refuse to not dive merely because I do not
have a dive buddy.  Two important factors enter in here.  1. I generally
will not buddy with someone I do not know.  I do grant that you can usually
tell a divers experience by there gear setup and a five to ten minute talk.
This also assumes you are in a situation where someone else is looking for a
dive buddy.  In most cases I'm on a dive boat (I generally wreck dive) and
everyone else is already paired.  2. My dive philosophy is I am ready to
respond to almost any emergency on my own.  Most people are aware that with
a catastrophic air emergency, a partner 30 to 40 feet away might as well be
a mile away.  Anything below 40 feet I have a fully redundant air supply.
That can mean anything from a 20 to 30 cuft pony (two independent systems),
to a twin setup with the tanks independent and a 30 to 40 cuft pony (three
independant systems).  I carry two or three knives on different parts of my
body in case I can't get at one or another.  I'm a conservative diver to
begin with, I am much more conservative when diving solo. While soloing, I
haven't done a dive below 130 feet, nor do I plan to at the present.  
Again, I don't believe there needs to be an absolute taboo on solo diving.
For those weighing this philosophy, try reading "Solo Diving, The Art of
Underwater Self-Sufficiency" by Robert Von Maier.  As a general disclaimer,
"I have nothing to gain in the selling of this book".

Safe diving.
Bill Wesemann
billj@ne*.co*  

>There is just no way i am buying any of this solo diving stuff, i know that
>this has been covered too many times and alot of you don't want to hear it,
>and i don't have the time to follow and responses (rich and i have spent 
>hours talking about it already in person, it could take weeks here) :-)
>
>my comment is that it's ridiculous to think or say that it's better to be
>in the water without a buddy.  yes the buddy can be a liability... but only
>if he or she isn't trained well enough to <<be>> a buddy... and alot of 
>people (imhe) don't want to take the time or efforts to reach this level of 
>proficency...  if you can't deal with being in the water with a buddy and
>all the concerns that go along with this system then you are not ready for
>diving this environment.  period.
>
>it's almost as bad as not having a tender/captain  on the boat... you guys
>are gonna get into trouble, you're gonna get bent or killed.
>for what!!!
>
>dennis pierce
>


Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]