>>> I'm still interested in what you people think (with certain exceptions) >>> about the issue of watching your buddy's mix underwater. >> >>Don't dive with a buddy. > >Better still, dive with Richard. You've already made him nearly orgasmic >twice now ;). ::grin:: I'm one of the exceptions too - I'll always dive with a buddy. Note, hopwever, that I won't COUNT on a buddy in case of a problem. Sure, there are circumstances where a buddy can be a liability. There are circumstances where a second regulator is a liability as well. Perhaps, then, we should leave off a second regulator (after all, if we're not diving with a buddy, then we don't need to share air, right?) Yes, that's a silly statement, but it's intended to make some people think a moment. -- Kevin -- kevink@ap*.co* It is hard to disagree with a pro-survival decision, It is even harder to engage in prolonged arguments with someone who consistently makes anti-survival decisions.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]