>>> I'm still interested in what you people think (with certain exceptions)
>>> about the issue of watching your buddy's mix underwater.
>>
>>Don't dive with a buddy.
>
>Better still, dive with Richard. You've already made him nearly orgasmic
>twice now ;).
::grin:: I'm one of the exceptions too - I'll always dive with a buddy.
Note, hopwever, that I won't COUNT on a buddy in case of a problem.
Sure, there are circumstances where a buddy can be a liability. There
are circumstances where a second regulator is a liability as well.
Perhaps, then, we should leave off a second regulator (after all, if
we're not diving with a buddy, then we don't need to share air, right?)
Yes, that's a silly statement, but it's intended to make some people
think a moment.
-- Kevin --
kevink@ap*.co*
It is hard to disagree with a pro-survival decision,
It is even harder to engage in prolonged arguments
with someone who consistently makes anti-survival decisions.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]