Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: cavers

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 14:43:45 +0000
To: "Caruso, Christina R (Christina)" <ccaruso@lu*.co*>, kirvine@sa*.ne*
From: Samy Elashmawy <samelash@ix*.ne*.co*>
Subject: RE: Scubapro Super Tek dual bladder wings for sale
Cc: "'Kevin Connell'" <kevin@nw*.co*>, cavers@cavers.com
At 03:14 PM 7/23/1999 -0400, Caruso, Christina R (Christina) wrote:
>I can answer the reason against steel in the ocean.  In case of emergency
>you need to be non negatively buoyant - Steel is not the best choice.  With
>AL you can drop your weights and be okay - you can't drop your steel
>tanks...

No , I would drop my whights and Canister light. That I think would take
care of the problem.
I noted that even goerge states he used steel with dry suit in oceane. Dry
suit alone has lots of boyency.

I think he was refering to wet suit diving when using allum. 80s


>_ G.I. said 
>I dive aluminum 80's and a weight belt and/or a cave light with a wet
>suit, and can drop the belt if I need to get up for any reason, like
>loss of gas, loss of hoses, etc. When diving steel I have a drysuit with
>its own inflation. Big steel tanks on a boat are dumb. 80's with an 80
>stage solves the hoovery problem, the multiple dive problems, and when
>you need to walk around a pitching deck, or take your tanks off in the
>water, you will appreciate the lighter aluminums.







>-----Original Message-----
>From: Samy Elashmawy [mailto:samelash@ix*.ne*.co*]
>Sent: Friday, July 23, 1999 10:06 AM
>To: kirvine@sa*.ne*; Caruso, Christina R (Christina)
>Cc: 'Kevin Connell'; cavers@cavers.com
>Subject: Re: Scubapro Super Tek dual bladder wings for sale
>
>
>>- proper gear balance is the correct
>
>Agreed
>
>>answer, not more gear to offset doing something stupid. I do more ocean
>>diving than cave diving, 
>>
>>I dive aluminum 80's and a weight belt and/or a cave light with a wet
>>suit, and can drop the belt if I need to get up for any reason, like
>>loss of gas, loss of hoses, etc. When diving steel I have a drysuit with
>>its own inflation. Big steel tanks on a boat are dumb. 80's with an 80
>>stage solves the hoovery problem, the multiple dive problems, and when
>>you need to walk around a pitching deck, or take your tanks off in the
>>water, you will appreciate the lighter aluminums.
>
>
>Gearge , Why are you so agenst steel tanks on ocean with a dry suit. Small
>Steel ,ie genisis 100s
>for example. (I know they rust) They are well balanced , You do not need to
>add a ton of lead to your wight belt.and you have 200 CFT of dive gas. Much
>more stream lined with an alluminum $0 of o2 for deco. Much more than twin
>80s, a 80 stage and  an aditional 40 cunbe deco bottle.
>
>Why drag the additional tanks along when you can do with this setup ?
>
>>Trying to manage a mess like double wings or inflators is patently
>>ridiculous, and extremely dangerous in my well informed and seasoned
>>opinion. Trying to teach pigs to sing in deep water is the excuse most
>>often proferred by our fine instuctional community, the mental
>>equivalent of roofers or car wash monkees, and I do not pay much
>>attention to what they have to say in diving or at the car wash.
>>
>>Obvious is obvious, and what it most obvious here is that we have idiots
>>dispening dive advice at the key levels - a real shame. Good thing there
>>are a few good ones out there, and good thing there is an alternative to
>>the bullshit - G.U.E.
>>
>>I got lucky and drew good ones from O/W to cave. Clearly you did not,
>>but it is not too late to go find out the real deal. You're missing the
>>freedom of diving the DIR way.
>>
>>Caruso, Christina R (Christina) wrote:
>>> 
>>> Most tech groups currently recommend Hogarthian set ups or minimization,
>but
>>> I have seen numerous editorials defending redundancy for deep ocean
>diving
>>> and last year there was an article (in Deep Tech I think..) that
>suggested
>>> dual BCs as an option for this.  I don't think that's as practical as
>dual
>>> bladders (cleaner set up).  If you want I can try to hunt through my old
>>> copies and try to find the article and therefore the author...
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Kevin Connell [mailto:kevin@nw*.co*]
>>> Sent: Friday, July 23, 1999 10:49 AM
>>> To: Caruso, Christina R (Christina)
>>> Cc: cavers@cavers.com
>>> Subject: RE: Scubapro Super Tek dual bladder wings for sale
>>> 
>>> Who recommends dual BC's?
>>> 
>>> At 09:56 AM 7/23/1999 -0400, you wrote:
>>> >kirvine@sa*.ne*,
>>> >         I know a lot of people have the personal preference of
>>> minimization,
>>> >and with CAVE diving you can "crawl" out but with deep OCEAN diving
>>> >redundancy is recommended.  Sorry I didn't specify that I was referring
>to
>>> >deep ocean.  The recommended redundancy is either a BCD and a lift bag
>>> >(which can be used for buoyancy if the BC fails) or dual BCs or dual
>>> >bladders.  Do you often do DEEP OCEAN diving??  The reason I'm selling
>this
>>> >BC is because I don't need or want such redundancy when cave diving and
>>> >don't do deep ocean diving.  I only need a little 45lb wing for my cave
>>> >diving.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >-----Original Message-----
>>> >From: kirvine@sa*.ne* [mailto:kirvine@sa*.ne*]
>>> >Sent: Friday, July 23, 1999 12:41 AM
>>> >To: Caruso, Christina R (Christina)
>>> >Cc: 'Bill Lais'; 'cavers@cavers.com'
>>> >Subject: Re: Scubapro Super Tek dual bladder wings for sale
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >This is a classic " the redundency needs of deep diving". Thanks for
>>> >coming in today, Christina.
>>> >
>>> >Caruso, Christina R (Christina) wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > What it is: a BCD, wing style, Scubapro Brand, SuperTek model for
>>> >technical
>>> > > diving.  It has full redundancy by having two bladders and two
>inflator
>>> > > hoses - aimed for the redundancy needs of deep diving.  It requires a
>>> > > backplate (like those used for double tanks)
>>> > >
>>> > > -----Original Message-----
>>> > > From: Bill Lais [mailto:billlais@mp*.ne*]
>>> > > Sent: Thursday, July 22, 1999 9:25 PM
>>> > > To: Caruso, Christina R (Christina); cavers@cavers.com
>>> > > Subject: Re: Scubapro Super Tek dual bladder wings for sale
>>> > >
>>> > > Stupbabro Scuper Tek gual dbladder googles
>>> > >
>>> > >  - say what??
>>> > >
>>> > > ----- Original Message -----
>>> > > From: Caruso, Christina R (Christina) <ccaruso@lu*.co*>
>>> > > To: <cavers@cavers.com>
>>> > > Sent: Thursday, July 22, 1999 8:06 PM
>>> > > Subject: Scubapro Super Tek dual bladder wings for sale
>>> > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I have a Scubapro Super Tek dual bladder wings for sale.  Owned
>less
>>> >than
>>> > > > one year (more wing than I need/want).  Will take $300 or best
>offer.
>>> > > >
>>> > > >  Christina Caruso
>>> > > >             407-875-4557
>>> > > >  FAX: 407-875-4474
>>> > > >  pager: 800-258-0336 pin 1273388
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> 
>>> -----------------------------------------------
>>> Kevin Connell <kevin@nw*.co*>
>>> 
>>> NW Labor Systems, Inc
>>> http://www.nwls.com
>>> 
>>> Who is John Galt?
>>> -----------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]