Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: cavers

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 14:06:00 +0000
To: kirvine@sa*.ne*, "Caruso, Christina R (Christina)" <ccaruso@lu*.co*>
From: Samy Elashmawy <samelash@ix*.ne*.co*>
Subject: Re: Scubapro Super Tek dual bladder wings for sale
Cc: "'Kevin Connell'" <kevin@nw*.co*>, cavers@cavers.com

>- proper gear balance is the correct

Agreed

>answer, not more gear to offset doing something stupid. I do more ocean
>diving than cave diving, 
>
>I dive aluminum 80's and a weight belt and/or a cave light with a wet
>suit, and can drop the belt if I need to get up for any reason, like
>loss of gas, loss of hoses, etc. When diving steel I have a drysuit with
>its own inflation. Big steel tanks on a boat are dumb. 80's with an 80
>stage solves the hoovery problem, the multiple dive problems, and when
>you need to walk around a pitching deck, or take your tanks off in the
>water, you will appreciate the lighter aluminums.


Gearge , Why are you so agenst steel tanks on ocean with a dry suit. Small
Steel ,ie genisis 100s
for example. (I know they rust) They are well balanced , You do not need to
add a ton of lead to your wight belt.and you have 200 CFT of dive gas. Much
more stream lined with an alluminum $0 of o2 for deco. Much more than twin
80s, a 80 stage and  an aditional 40 cunbe deco bottle.

Why drag the additional tanks along when you can do with this setup ?

>Trying to manage a mess like double wings or inflators is patently
>ridiculous, and extremely dangerous in my well informed and seasoned
>opinion. Trying to teach pigs to sing in deep water is the excuse most
>often proferred by our fine instuctional community, the mental
>equivalent of roofers or car wash monkees, and I do not pay much
>attention to what they have to say in diving or at the car wash.
>
>Obvious is obvious, and what it most obvious here is that we have idiots
>dispening dive advice at the key levels - a real shame. Good thing there
>are a few good ones out there, and good thing there is an alternative to
>the bullshit - G.U.E.
>
>I got lucky and drew good ones from O/W to cave. Clearly you did not,
>but it is not too late to go find out the real deal. You're missing the
>freedom of diving the DIR way.
>
>Caruso, Christina R (Christina) wrote:
>> 
>> Most tech groups currently recommend Hogarthian set ups or minimization,
but
>> I have seen numerous editorials defending redundancy for deep ocean diving
>> and last year there was an article (in Deep Tech I think..) that suggested
>> dual BCs as an option for this.  I don't think that's as practical as dual
>> bladders (cleaner set up).  If you want I can try to hunt through my old
>> copies and try to find the article and therefore the author...
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kevin Connell [mailto:kevin@nw*.co*]
>> Sent: Friday, July 23, 1999 10:49 AM
>> To: Caruso, Christina R (Christina)
>> Cc: cavers@cavers.com
>> Subject: RE: Scubapro Super Tek dual bladder wings for sale
>> 
>> Who recommends dual BC's?
>> 
>> At 09:56 AM 7/23/1999 -0400, you wrote:
>> >kirvine@sa*.ne*,
>> >         I know a lot of people have the personal preference of
>> minimization,
>> >and with CAVE diving you can "crawl" out but with deep OCEAN diving
>> >redundancy is recommended.  Sorry I didn't specify that I was referring to
>> >deep ocean.  The recommended redundancy is either a BCD and a lift bag
>> >(which can be used for buoyancy if the BC fails) or dual BCs or dual
>> >bladders.  Do you often do DEEP OCEAN diving??  The reason I'm selling
this
>> >BC is because I don't need or want such redundancy when cave diving and
>> >don't do deep ocean diving.  I only need a little 45lb wing for my cave
>> >diving.
>> >
>> >
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: kirvine@sa*.ne* [mailto:kirvine@sa*.ne*]
>> >Sent: Friday, July 23, 1999 12:41 AM
>> >To: Caruso, Christina R (Christina)
>> >Cc: 'Bill Lais'; 'cavers@cavers.com'
>> >Subject: Re: Scubapro Super Tek dual bladder wings for sale
>> >
>> >
>> >This is a classic " the redundency needs of deep diving". Thanks for
>> >coming in today, Christina.
>> >
>> >Caruso, Christina R (Christina) wrote:
>> > >
>> > > What it is: a BCD, wing style, Scubapro Brand, SuperTek model for
>> >technical
>> > > diving.  It has full redundancy by having two bladders and two inflator
>> > > hoses - aimed for the redundancy needs of deep diving.  It requires a
>> > > backplate (like those used for double tanks)
>> > >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: Bill Lais [mailto:billlais@mp*.ne*]
>> > > Sent: Thursday, July 22, 1999 9:25 PM
>> > > To: Caruso, Christina R (Christina); cavers@cavers.com
>> > > Subject: Re: Scubapro Super Tek dual bladder wings for sale
>> > >
>> > > Stupbabro Scuper Tek gual dbladder googles
>> > >
>> > >  - say what??
>> > >
>> > > ----- Original Message -----
>> > > From: Caruso, Christina R (Christina) <ccaruso@lu*.co*>
>> > > To: <cavers@cavers.com>
>> > > Sent: Thursday, July 22, 1999 8:06 PM
>> > > Subject: Scubapro Super Tek dual bladder wings for sale
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > I have a Scubapro Super Tek dual bladder wings for sale.  Owned less
>> >than
>> > > > one year (more wing than I need/want).  Will take $300 or best offer.
>> > > >
>> > > >  Christina Caruso
>> > > >             407-875-4557
>> > > >  FAX: 407-875-4474
>> > > >  pager: 800-258-0336 pin 1273388
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> 
>> -----------------------------------------------
>> Kevin Connell <kevin@nw*.co*>
>> 
>> NW Labor Systems, Inc
>> http://www.nwls.com
>> 
>> Who is John Galt?
>> -----------------------------------------------
>
>
>

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]