One additional problem that I see with your suggestion is that just as a=20 result of the amount of exercise that you suggest a researcher would see=20 a difference in the amount of O2 used in the subject (from=20 conditioning). There would be a way to take that into account if you=20 used a control group to compare the effects of conditioning on your subject= s. IMHO this would make a great research project for some aspiring PhD=20 student if you could find anyone to underwrite the costs. Alan Chapman=09=09=09=09=09NAUI #10476 achapman@co*.ua*.ed*=09=09=09=09NREMT University of Arkansas Fayetteville =A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5= =A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5= =A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5= =A5=A5 Education may not be all it is cracked up to be, but it sure beats ignoranc= e! =09=09=09 =20 =09=09=09 =20 =A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5= =A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5= =A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5=A5= =A5=A5 On Thu, 2 Nov 1995, ucca15j wrote: >=20 > Dear All, >=20 > Perhaps the following has been tried or if not would shed some light on > the O2 vs. Air debate with regard to exercise and tiredness. >=20 > Using resting heart rate as a measure of tiredness (common among athletes= ). >=20 > Get a subject (the more the better for stats) to exercise at a fixed > rate for say 1 hour on a bicycle using air. get them to do this for a we= ek > and measure there heart rate at different times of day. this should give = you > an idea of how tired this level of exercise makes one. etc.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]