Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Tue, 24 Oct 95 13:54:03 +1000
From: DAVID OGILVIE <ltd450@oz*.co*.au*>
Organization: OzEmail Pty Ltd
To: techdiver@terra.net (Techdiver Letter Address)
Subject: To octopus or not to octopus
To everybody,

I have been shown 2 different regulator configuartion for rigging twin 
cylinders. At this point I do not wish to discuss pony bottles, deco bottles, 
long hoses, manifolds, etc just the regulators on the 2 cylinders containing 
the bottom mix.

For many years I was told that the reg not in your mouth was the octopus or 
that you donated the one in your mouth and you swapped to the other reg. 
Recently I was told that this  was not a good idea and that one of the 
regulators should have  2 second stages with the second one available for your 
buddy should they need it.

The second system sounds like you could easily end up with 2 people breathing 
from one cylinder and then being left with 1 second stage between 2 people.

If you could comment on either method I am interested to hear your points of 
view.

Also are there any documented studies or tested procedures on what a diver 
should do if they mistakenly omit a deco stop(s)  and then realise their error 
either before or after surfacing and there is sufficient gas.  I am already 
aware of the old Navy ommited deco procedure.

David O.





Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]